ARTICLE
3 November 2023

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update, September 2023

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
United States Massachusetts Intellectual Property

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

In ModernaTX, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc., No. 1:22-cv-11378, Judge Stearns granted Moderna's motion to compel Defendants to respond to interrogatories and detail (i) their knowledge of the nature of Moderna's work in the mRNA vaccine space and (ii) state the date on which they first became aware of the patent.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More