CURATED
4 August 2026

CPSC’s New E-Filing Mandate: What Importers Need To Know

BG
Braumiller Law Group, PLLC

Contributor

Braumiller Law Group, PLLC, is a highly respected boutique law firm based in Dallas, Texas with offices in the US and Mexico. The firm is focused on international trade compliance and proven strategies to optimize global trade business practices. The attorneys and trade advisors of Braumiller Law Group, and Braumiller Consulting Group, know exactly how to navigate the intricate maze of global trade regulations, and have a successful track record for helping clients save millions of dollars in compliance penalties.
For over fifteen years, importers of regulated consumer products operated under a reactive compliance model: certificates of compliance were required at the time of import under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, but importers only had to produce them on CPSC’s request.
United States International Law
Kerry Wang’s articles from Braumiller Law Group, PLLC are most popular:
  • within International Law topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services industries
Braumiller Law Group, PLLC are most popular:
  • within International Law, Corporate/Commercial Law and Accounting and Audit topic(s)

For over fifteen years, importers of regulated consumer products operated under a reactive compliance model: certificates of compliance were required at the time of import under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, but importers only had to produce them on CPSC’s request.

That reactive model ended July 8, 2026. A Final Rule published January 8, 2025, amending 16 C.F.R. Part 1110, made electronic filing of certificate data mandatory at time of entry, through CPSC’s Partner Government Agency (PGA) Message Set within CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). See 90 Fed. Reg. 1,800 (Jan. 8, 2025). The requirement extends to goods withdrawn from Foreign Trade Zones for consumption or warehousing beginning January 8, 2027. There is no de minimis exception: eFiling applies at every shipment value, including entries that previously qualified for informal, low-documentation treatment under Section 321. Id.

Importers have three filing options, and different lines within a single consolidated entry may use different methods:

  • Disclaimer. Used where a product falls under a CPSC-flagged HTS code but requires no certificate. Disclaim A covers products for which no certificate is required at all; Disclaim B covers products where CPSC exercises enforcement discretion despite an applicable rule.
  • Reference Message. Certificate data is filed once with CPSC’s Product Registry in advance; each subsequent entry references the stored certificate.
  • Full Message. Complete certificate data is filed with each individual entry.

The underlying certification obligation has not changed, only how and when the data reaches the government. CPSC has published a guidance list of several hundred HTS codes likely to include regulated products. The list is not exhaustive, and inclusion or omission does not determine whether a given product requires certification; that turns on the product itself, not its tariff classification. Importers remain responsible for that determination regardless of whether ACE flags the line.

The requirement applies to finished products imported for consumption, warehousing, or distribution. Component parts destined for further U.S. manufacturing fall outside its scope. Brokers and consolidators may transmit the data, but certification responsibility remains with the importer of record unless the IOR designates the owner, purchaser, or another party with a financial interest in the goods as responsible.

Each entry receives a status through ACE’s PGA messaging: “May Proceed” (cleared), “PGA Under Review” (goods may reach the importer’s premises but cannot enter commerce pending CPSC review), or a deficiency notice requiring correction and retransmission. Noncompliant or incomplete filings feed CPSC’s risk-scoring system, increasing exams and holds on future shipments; consequences for failure can include prolonged port holds, seizure, and civil or criminal exposure under the CPSA.

To prepare, importers should require manufacturers to supply, before goods leave origin: product identification, the applicable safety rule(s), date and place of manufacture, date and place of testing, the testing laboratory, the certifying party, the records custodian, and any testing exclusions relied upon. Certificates and underlying test records must be retained for five years.

This is an administrative layer on an existing obligation, not a new substantive duty. Importers who have certified compliant products all along have little to adjust beyond filing mechanics. Importers who were previously lax about the underlying requirement now face that exposure at the border in real time.

Check out our new Digital Magazine Get the inside scoop on the Braumiller Law Group & Braumiller Consulting Group "peeps." Expertise in International Trade Compliance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More