ARTICLE
7 May 2026

Department Of Commerce Issues New Duty-Free Code For 232 Tariffs

DT
Diaz Trade Law

Contributor

A boutique law firm with a track record of success, Diaz Trade Law has rapidly become one of the nation’s leading Customs and International Trade Law firms. Diaz Trade Law’s diverse team of attorneys specialize in all aspects of U.S. federal trade law, from compliance to resolution of urgent issues.
On April 27, 2026, the Department of Commerce published a Federal Register notice adding a new duty-free code in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The addition resolves a discrepancy for goods classified under HTSUS Chapters for steel, aluminum, and copper that were subject to 232 tariff classification even though they did not contain any of these elements.
United States International Law

On April 27, 2026, the Department of Commerce published a Federal Register notice adding a new duty-free code in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The addition resolves a discrepancy for goods classified under HTSUS Chapters for steel, aluminum, and copper that were subject to 232 tariff classification even though they did not contain any of these elements. The provision, subheading 9903.82, applies retroactively to April 6, 2026. 

Recent 232 Developments 

This notice is the latest in a series of adjustments to 232 tariffs on steel, copper, iron, and aluminum.  

On April 2, 2026, the President issued a proclamation strengthening Section 232 actions to adjust imports of aluminum, steel, and copper, continuing to cite national security concerns and the need to reinforce domestic metals industries. Key elements of the proclamation include: a tiered tariff structure and some products exempt from Sec. 232 tariffs, and manufacturing drawback claims. Read more here

CBP has attempted to help importers navigate 232 tariffs. The agency recently published  FAQs and CSMS messages on steel and aluminum about how to calculate and report the value of the steel and aluminum content of steel and aluminum derivative articles.  

232 has been a hot topic at the Court of International Trade (CIT) as well. There is a current case challenging how CBP has been valuing and applying Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum derivative products. Express Fasteners, Ltd. ofIllinois filed the lawsuit, arguing that its imports of screws and fasteners were unlawfully assessed Section 232 steel duties. 

What Importers Should Do 

All importers should revisit their classification processes to ensure that their products are classified correctly, and that the proper duties are applied. Importers should also prioritize proper documentation and recordkeeping, as CBP may ask for detailed breakdowns and supporting analysis at any time. CBP enforcement is on the rise, and penalties for tariff evasion, even if incidental, can be significant. 

Diaz Trade Law will continue to monitor developments and will provide additional information as it becomes available. In the meantime, contact us for assistance with valuation procedures, recordkeeping, staff training, and more. 305-456-3830, info@diaztradelaw.com 

Learn more: 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More