ARTICLE
7 May 2026

Three Enforcement Actions, One Message: Trade Violations Are Serious Crimes

DT
Diaz Trade Law

Contributor

A boutique law firm with a track record of success, Diaz Trade Law has rapidly become one of the nation’s leading Customs and International Trade Law firms. Diaz Trade Law’s diverse team of attorneys specialize in all aspects of U.S. federal trade law, from compliance to resolution of urgent issues.
As tariffs climb and global trade becomes more complex, a growing number of importers are testing the limits, or outright breaking the law, to reduce or avoid duty payments and other compliance costs. U.S. enforcement agencies, including Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), have made it clear that customs fraud will not be tolerated and is a top enforcement priority.
United States International Law

Learn more about this topic in our upcoming webinar: From Error to Action: Filing a Prior Disclosure with CBP 

As tariffs climb and global trade becomes more complex, a growing number of importers are testing the limits, or outright breaking the law, to reduce or avoid duty payments and other compliance costs. U.S. enforcement agencies, including Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), have made it clear that customs fraud will not be tolerated and is a top enforcement priority. Three recent cases illustrate the new reality for enforcement. 

1. Undervaluation and the False Claims Act: $2.1 Million Settlement

An importer of fitness equipment agreed to pay $2.1 million to resolve allegations under the False Claims Act that it knowingly undervalued imported goods. 

According to the government, the company knowingly declared artificially low values on its imports in order to reduce tariff obligations. The company also failed to include the cost of computer tablets incorporated into packaged equipment.  

The settlement also resolves a qui tam False Claims Act case brought by a whistleblower, Mr. Greg Dahlstrom. Dahlstrom will receive $420,000 of the proceeds from the settlement. 

2. Importing Precursor Chemicals: Possible Life Sentence

On April 27, 2026, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced the unsealing of an indictment charging two Chinese nationals with importing a methamphetamine precursor chemical into the United States with the intent to manufacture narcotics, along with conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine.  

The defendants face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for importation of a methamphetamine precursor chemical and a maximum sentence of life in prison for the conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine charge.  

While the underlying conduct and more serious charges involve controlled substances, the case highlights that the importation of prohibited goods is a key enforcement point. 

3. Timber Trafficking and Duty Evasion: $6.3 Million Penalty

In another enforcement action, an importer pleaded guilty to a felony violation of the Lacey Act and was ordered to pay $6.3 million. The importer, Boise Cascade, is a publicly traded company. Boise illegally imported hardwood plywood from China and violated the Lacey Act by falsifying import declarations in an effort to hide the country of origin and avoid anti-dumping and countervailing duties. The company’s previous illicit activity was a factor in the case, as it had previously tried to hide the origin of wood that it imported by transshipping products through Malaysia.   

The Bigger Picture and What Importers Should Do 

While these cases involve very different facts, they all demonstrate that the government means what it says in prioritizing enforcement. Further, penalties are not limited to unpaid duties, and prosecutors are not afraid to seek big settlement amounts or prison time.  

Now more than ever, it is critical for importers to examine their import compliance programs and ensure that adequate procedures are in place to correctly enter goods into the United States.  

Importers should proactively conduct extensive due diligence in their supply chains to ensure they can detect, report, and remedy any noncompliance with customs requirements. In addition, if an importer becomes aware of the fraudulent conduct of a competitor, they should contact counsel to discuss options for reporting it to the government. 

Diaz Trade Law can assist importers in developing compliance plans and guide importers in the event of a customs investigation. Contact us at 305-456-3830 or info@diaztradelaw.com

Learn more: 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More