ARTICLE
2 November 2021

USTR Accepting Comments On Reinstating Certain Exclusions To Section 301 Tariffs

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") is seeking comments on the possible reinstatement of Section 301 tariff exclusions on 549 Chinese-origin products
United States International Law

The Office of the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") is seeking comments on the possible reinstatement of Section 301 tariff exclusions on 549 Chinese-origin products.

The Office of the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") has posted a Federal Register notice inviting comments on whether to reinstate previously granted Section 301 tariff exclusions on certain Chinese-origin products. At this time, comments are limited to the 549 products that previously received both an initial product exclusion and an exclusion extension. The USTR will now evaluate the possible reinstatement of those exclusions.

The focus of the USTR's evaluation will be whether "the particular product remains available only from China." The USTR will also consider, among other things, whether reinstating or not reinstating an exclusion "will impact or result in severe economic harm to the commenter or other U.S. interests, including the impact on small businesses, employment, manufacturing output, and critical supply chains in the United States.."

The comment period will run through December 1, 2021, at 11:59 p.m. EST. The Federal Register notice outlines the factors that commenters should address in their submissions. At present, it is uncertain whether received comments will be considered to be a formal product exclusion request, or whether a separate submission may be subsequently required for a particular exclusion.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More