ARTICLE
17 April 2018

Health Plans And Pharmacy Benefit Managers – Past And Future

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
Historically, health plans and pharmacy benefit managers ("PBMs") have been uncomfortable neighbors. Plans provide drug coverage, but contract out the provision of such drugs to independent PBMs.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Historically, health plans and pharmacy benefit managers ("PBMs") have been uncomfortable neighbors. Plans provide drug coverage, but contract out the provision of such drugs to independent PBMs. PBMs in turn earn market rents by negotiating discounts (and big rebates) with Big Pharma, in turn offering structured medication formularies to plans.

PBMs make money when plan beneficiaries use drugs. Plans make money when they ensure efficient care of beneficiaries and attract clients. The interests of these two groups don't necessarily align.

When UnitedHealth used Optum to set up its own PBM, other plans took notice. Now both Cigna (ExpressScripts) and Aetna (CVS) have moved to acquire or align with strong PBMs and/or pharmacies.

As the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division ponders the competitive landscape, all healthcare market participants should consider what to make of the significant modification of the competitive landscape.

Given the original move by UnitedHealth, it may be hard to quibble with the proposed responses by Cigna and Aetna. It makes sense for plans to have a more direct and timely say over the acquisition and provision of medications, an ever rising share of the U.S. healthcare spend.

Technologically speaking, there is significant room for innovation in the prescription delivery system.

SureScripts is a rarely recognized hub and choke point for pharmaceutical management. Owned jointly by pharmacies and PBMs, SureScripts helpfully relays medication eligibility, patient drug histories, and prescriptions between and among providers, PBMs, and pharmacies. SureScripts earns significant fees for these services, historically from PBMs and pharmacies.

But, SureScripts has arguably held back innovative efforts by plans and alternative pharmacy delivery systems to have real time input with providers on prescription decisions. As a result, communications between plans, their contracted PBMs, providers, and pharmacies, though electronic in part, have remained limited.

As plans start, acquire, or more closely align with PBMs and/or pharmacies, plans (the entities that collect and spend the healthcare dollars) may finally gain more real time input on prescribing decisions, resulting at least in a more efficient pharmaceutical spend.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More