ARTICLE
17 December 2014

D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge To Section 503 Regulations Administered By OFCCP

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP

Contributor

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
The D.C. Circuit rejected a challenge by Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. to the recent rules promulgated by OFCCP under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Friday, December 12, 2014, the D.C. Circuit rejected a challenge by Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. ("ABC") to the recent rules promulgated by OFCCP under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act protecting individuals with disabilities.  Those rules, among other things, established an aspirational seven percent utilization goal and required contractors to invite applicants to self-identify as an individual with a disability at the application stage (in addition to soliciting disclosures after extending an offer of employment).

ABC argued that the rules are invalid because they were contrary to Section 503 and OFCCP had not offered sufficient justification for them.  The D.C. Circuit, in a unanimous decision issued by Judge David Tatel, rejected ABC's arguments.  The Court determined that nothing in the OFCCP's regulations contradicted the terms of Section 503.  Furthermore, the Court concluded that OFCCP's adoption of a utilization goal represented a decision among a range of choices within OFCCP's discretion.  OFCCP also adequately explained its reasoning for adopting a utilization goal.

D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge To Section 503 Regulations Administered By OFCCP

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More