ARTICLE
30 January 2024

California Department Of Financial Protection Issues Consent Order Against Fintech Company

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
On January 9, 2024, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced that it entered into a consent order with a Delaware fintech...
United States Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On January 9, 2024, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced that it entered into a consent order with a Delaware fintech company that provided California consumers with access to an internet-based platform for merchants to offer installment payments for the purchase of outdoor-adventure equipment.

According to the consent order, since at least January 2021, the company has contracted with a third-party servicer to service all installment-payment contracts with the company's customers. Before the customers would make a first payment, the servicer provided information to them on how to make payments without incurring fees, and it also provided information on alternate ways to make payments, e.g., by phone, through the servicer's website, or by setting up recurring electronic payments, all of which incurred a convenience fee.

Although the company ensured that its customers had an option to make fee-free payments, for a period of time the company failed to inform customers that alternate fee-based arrangements were available until after its customers had entered their payment contracts with the company. The DFPI found this practice to be deceptive.

Under the consent order, the company agreed to pay a $50,000 penalty and to disclose to California consumers the existence and cost of any potential third-party servicer fees when those consumers enter into installment contracts with the company.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More