ARTICLE
19 August 2022

CFPB Targets FinTech For Faulty Automated Savings Algorithm

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On August 10, the CFPB issued a consent order against a FinTech company for a faulty algorithm utilized in its personal finance management app that caused...
United States Technology
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On August 10, the CFPB issued a consent order against a FinTech company for a faulty algorithm utilized in its personal finance management app that caused consumer accounts to overdraft and incur overdraft penalties. According to the CFPB, although the San Francisco-based fintech company promoted the app as a savings tool for consumers, it engaged in deceptive acts or practices in violation of the CFPA by:

  • Falsely claiming a "no overdraft guarantee" - although the FinTech represented that it "never transfers more than you can afford" and claimed to offer "no overdraft guarantee," it routinely caused consumers to incur overdraft fees charged by their banks.
  • Failing to reimburse overdraft fees - the FinTech claimed that it would reimburse consumers if there was an overdraft, but often denied consumer requests for reimbursement.
  • Keeping interest earned - despite claiming that it would not keep any interest earned on consumer funds it was holding, the FinTech kept the interest earned.

The CFPB's consent order enjoins the FinTech company from making any further misrepresentations related to its "auto-save" algorithm, requires the company to pay at least $68,145 in consumer redress for rejecting reimbursement requests for overdraft fees incurred, and payment of $2.7 million in civil penalties.

Putting It Into Practice: This recent enforcement action demonstrates that FinTechs are a focal point for allegations of consumer protection violations through their use of algorithms to determine consumer outcomes, including outside of the fair lending context. Consistent with this consent order, FinTechs should ensure that its' algorithms do not function in a manner that runs afoul of consumer protection laws-for example, by producing results that contradict the companies' guarantees and promises to consumers. Similarly, companies should note that this latest action also highlights another one of the CFPB's current policy pushes: reining in overdraft fees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More