ARTICLE
14 February 2025

Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure Litigation Updates — February 2025

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
Following a bench trial, on January 10, 2025, Judge Reed O'Connor of the US District Court of the Northern District of Texas held that the managers of a company's 401(k) retirement plans...
United States Energy and Natural Resources

Following a bench trial, on January 10, 2025, Judge Reed O'Connor of the US District Court of the Northern District of Texas held that the managers of a company's 401(k) retirement plans had breached their fiduciary duty by allowing their investment decisions to be impacted by ESG interests. Specifically, the court held that “[w]hile it is permissible to consider ESG risks when done through a strictly financial lens . . . ESG cannot stand on its own. . . . [as] ERISA does not permit a fiduciary to pursue a non-pecuniary interest no matter how noble it might view the aim.” This is the first decision to consider whether ESG-focused investing of a 401(k) plan was in accordance with fiduciary duty principles, and the finding by the court that such actions constituted a breach of fiduciary duty will likely influence both other lawsuits and industry players.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More