California Supreme Court Rules On Class Waivers

The court holds that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable but PAGA waivers are not.
United States Employment and HR

The court holds that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable but PAGA waivers are not.

On June 23, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC.The court found that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable. The court rejected arguments made by the plaintiff that class action waivers are unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act. However, the court concluded that waivers to bring representative actions on behalf of the state under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) are contrary to public policy. The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act does not preempt state law prohibiting waivers of PAGA representative actions in employment arbitration agreements.

Our upcoming LawFlash will provide more detailed discussion of the decision and its implications for employers.

This article is provided as a general informational service and it should not be construed as imparting legal advice on any specific matter.

California Supreme Court Rules On Class Waivers

United States Employment and HR

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More