ARTICLE
13 June 2022

2022 Proxy Season Review: Increased Shareholder Focus On Racial Justice

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
The 2022 proxy season has highlighted shareholders' ever-growing focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In 2021, a new trend emerged as 13 shareholder proposals...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The 2022 proxy season has highlighted shareholders' ever-growing focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In 2021, a new trend emerged as 13 shareholder proposals were filed calling on companies to conduct "civil rights" or "racial equity" audits. This year's proxy season saw a dramatic increase in the number of these proposals, with 40 companies receiving such requests.

Whereas the proposals filed in 2021 largely focused on the financial services industry, companies across a range of industries—including tech, retail, consumer products, and insurance—received proposals in 2022. The proposals vary in their specifics, but generally request that a company retain a third party to conduct an audit assessing the racial impacts of the company's business on internal and external stakeholders. Proposals tend to highlight a few internal and external areas of focus for an audit—for example, employee diversity, DEI initiatives, or the external impact of a company's products, services, or investments.

Unlike in 2021, when none of the proposals that ultimately were voted upon received majority shareholder support, eight proposals requesting equity audits received majority shareholder support this year.1 Sixteen such proposals were withdrawn by the petitioning shareholders prior to a vote—and in some of these cases, companies have already announced their intention to conduct an equity audit.

This season also saw a proliferation of "anti ESG" shareholder proposals, with the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) filing ten "civil rights and non-discrimination" proposals. While the resolution text of these proposals calls on companies to conduct audits of their impact on civil rights, the proposals also argue that "anti-racist" programs are discriminatory "against employees deemed non-diverse." NCPPR's proposals were uniformly unsuccessful this season, achieving less than 5% of shareholder support in each instance.

Given the likelihood of continued support for equity audit proposals, and the increasing pressure from shareholders and consumers on DEI issues more generally, companies should consider their options for proactive engagement on these issues. Companies may contemplate conducting a voluntary equity audit—even when they have not yet received a shareholder proposal or when a proposal has failed—to preempt future proposals and to retain the flexibility to control the scope and timing of an audit. And all companies, as this proxy season draws to a close, should pay close attention to sentiments among shareholders and ready themselves for external engagement on DEI issues.

Footnote

1. As of the date of this post, equity audit proposals have passed at MAXIMUS, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, Home Depot, Inc., Waste Management, Inc., Stericycle, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Apple, Inc., and Altria Group, Inc. Proposals are still pending at three additional companies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More