ARTICLE
27 October 2020

Can You Predict A Split Decision In Criminal Cases At The California Supreme Court After Oral Argument?

AP
Arnold & Porter

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
Now we turn to the data for the criminal docket. In outright reversals, respondents averaged more questions than appellants in three of five years between 2016 and 2020 – 2016, 2018 and 2020.
United States Criminal Law

Now we turn to the data for the criminal docket. In outright reversals, respondents averaged more questions than appellants in three of five years between 2016 and 2020 – 2016, 2018 and 2020.

998276a.jpg

We mentioned in a previous post that there was some indication – notwithstanding the tiny data sets – that partial reversals might have an unexpected impact on the question patterns. Turning to split decisions in criminal cases, we find that appellants average more questions in all five years between 2016 and 2020.

998276b.jpg

Join us back here next Thursday as we turn our attention to further oral argument data.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Ian Sane (no changes).

Originally published by California Supreme Court Review

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More