ARTICLE
24 March 2023

In A Virtual World, Should Courts Still Require Geographical Limitations For Restrictive Covenants?

PA
Peckar & Abramson PC

Contributor

For over four decades, Peckar & Abramson has been a leader and innovator in construction law, providing tailored results for its clients – delivered with a commitment to efficiency, value and client service. With over 100 attorneys in nine offices in the United States and affiliations around the globe, P&A is the recipient of many accolades that reflect the firm’s stature as the premier construction law firm in the industry. Firmly rooted in its history, P&A maintains an unmatched national presence while providing its local clients with highly sophisticated legal insights.
Lauren Rayner Davis, senior associate in P&A's Labor and Employment Practice, co-authored the article "In a Virtual World, Should Courts Still Require Geographical Limitations for Restrictive Covenants?"
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Peckar & Abramson PC are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Media & Information industries

Lauren Rayner Davis, senior associate in P&A's Labor and Employment Practice, co-authored the article "In a Virtual World, Should Courts Still Require Geographical Limitations for Restrictive Covenants?" This article written for the New Jersey Law Journal discusses whether courts should still require geographical limitations for restrictive covenants in this new post-pandemic virtual world.

To read more of Laurens and her co-author's insights, those with a subscription can access the full article here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More