ARTICLE
23 April 2025

New Copyright Lawsuit Against Roblox!

MH
Markowitz Herbold PC

Contributor

Markowitz Herbold is a litigation law firm that tries high-stakes business disputes for individuals, companies and state, local and regional governments, to juries, judges and arbitrators. We are known by our peers for resolving complicated and challenging cases.

The firm is based in Portland, Oregon, and our lawyers practice before state and federal trial courts in the Northwest and across the country.

We’ve earned our reputation as an “outstanding boutique firm” by delivering results: Multi-million dollar jury verdicts, successful settlements of “unresolvable” cases, and fierce defenses of difficult claims. Our courtroom savvy is widely known. Clients and even other lawyers often hire us, sometimes on the eve of trial, to take over as lead counsel or provide strategic advice.

The plaintiff is Kelley Heyer, the creator of the "viral apple dance." That's a dance she performed on TikTok and registered the copyright in.
United States Intellectual Property

1️⃣ The plaintiff is Kelley Heyer, the creator of the "viral apple dance." That's a dance she performed on TikTok and registered the copyright in.

(Yes, dances and emotes are copyrightable!)

2️⃣ "Roblox is the developer of the video game of the same name."

Ok, I'm going to guess that this attorney doesn't spend much time on Roblox if this is how they describe it. Not an auspicious start.

1614542a.jpg

3️⃣ Now its getting interesting:

👉 the plaintiff alleges that Roblox was contracted by WMG/Atlantic, CharliXCX's label, to feature CharliXCX on Dress to Impress.

👉 Roblox then contacted the plaintiff to license her Apple Dance as an emote.

4️⃣ Ruh-roh! The plaintiff alleges that while in license negotiations with Roblox, Roblox released the Apple Dance emote for sale. But no license was ever finalized. Meaning, Roblox didn't have permission to use it!

💡 Slight tangent here. What's different about this copyright case, is that the Apple Dance appears to have actually been made and sold by Roblox, and not by a UGC creator.

💡That can be legally significant. In general, platforms like Roblox are immune from copyright liability for their users' actions, as long as they have a DMCA program. But this is probably different, since Roblox appears to have made and sold the dance itself.

1614542b.jpg

5️⃣ Let's see... how much money is at stake here? The plaintiff alleges that Roblox made $123k in sales on the emote. So not a huge amount at stake.

6️⃣ The plaintiff has two claims: copyright infringement and unjust enrichment. Unjust enrichment basically means a party got something of value, without permission, and needs to give it up.

💡 Here's my wild guess about what happened: the timing of launching the dance was probably important. So Roblox released it while they were still negotiating and before the deal was struck. My guess is that this case will be quickly settled.

**As a reminder, these are the allegations in the complaint. I have no idea what actually happened!*

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More