"Inspired Or Infringed": Oxley Discussed Copyright Claims In The Film Industry With Bloomberg Law

PC
Pryor Cashman LLP

Contributor

A premier, midsized law firm headquartered in New York City, Pryor Cashman boasts nearly 180 attorneys and offices in both Los Angeles and Miami. From every office, we are known for getting the job done right, and doing it with integrity, efficiency and élan.
Recent copyright infringement allegations related to film productions beg the question - what's the difference between infringement and inspiration.
United States Intellectual Property

Recent copyright infringement allegations related to film productions beg the question - what's the difference between infringement and inspiration? In a conversation with Bloomberg Law, counsel Jamice Oxley discussed key takeaways a creative should keep in mind when approaching a pitch and dispels some myth about studios. According to Bloomberg Law:

"Don't publish the work before the pitch," entertainment attorney Jamice Oxley of Pryor Cashman LLP said. "An executive can claim they had access to this concept another way."

[...]

Oxley acknowledged studios and networks "really are goliaths" with a strong power advantage over creators. But Oxley, who often represents creators but also sometimes studios, said reputation and legal liability act as constraints.

"The energy is always in the spirit of collaboration and creation," Oxley said. "It's a relationship business. No studio or network is in a hat and dark glasses looking to steal, because it will backfire in the long run."

Read the article in full via the link below. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More