ARTICLE
10 December 2020

CFPB Sues Online Lender For Alleged Military Lending Act Violations

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

The CFPB charged an online lender for Military Lending Act ("MLA") violations in connection with the extension of consumer credit to active-duty service members and their dependents.
United States Consumer Protection
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Consumer Protection, Intellectual Property, Government and Public Sector topic(s)
  • in Asia
  • with readers working within the Consumer Industries industries

The CFPB charged an online lender for Military Lending Act ("MLA") violations in connection with the extension of consumer credit to active-duty service members and their dependents ("covered borrowers").

As alleged in the CFPB Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the lender made over 4,000 single-payment or installment loans to over 1,200 covered borrowers that (i) imposed an annual percentage rate greater than 36%, (ii) imposed mandatory arbitration in the case of a dispute and (iii) failed to make required loan disclosures - all in violation of federal MLA protections. The CFPB further alleged that, as a result of the violations, each consumer credit agreement was void from the inception of the contract.

The CFPB is seeking an injunction against the lender that would prevent it from collecting any debts on the affected loans to covered borrowers, as well as an Order from the District Court requiring the lender to correct any inaccurate information furnished to consumer reporting agencies regarding amounts delinquent or owed on the agreements. The CFPB is also seeking damages, restitution, disgorgement and civil money penalties.

Commentary Rachel Rodman

Consumer installment lenders - and particularly FinTech lenders - should take note of the CFPB's action to enforce the MLA. This is not an authority often exercised by the CFPB and allows the agency directly to enforce the MLA's 36% usury cap and seek significant penalties. Here, the CFPB alleges that the lender's loans to covered service members were void ab initio and seeks an injunction preventing the lender from collecting any debts on the affected loans.

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More