ARTICLE
11 February 2019

Associations Respond To FSB Paper On Recapitalization Of CCP In Resolution

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

ISDA, FIA and the Institute of International Finance responded to issues concerning central counterparty ("CCPs") resolution raised in a discussion paper published by the Financial Stability Board ("FSB").
United States Finance and Banking

ISDA, FIA and the Institute of International Finance responded to issues concerning central counterparty ("CCPs") resolution raised in a discussion paper published by the Financial Stability Board ("FSB"). The comment letter addresses CCP equity, the amount of "skin in the game" a CCP should be required to maintain (that is, the amount of losses it must absorb before imposing losses on clearing members), and the rules that should govern "No Creditor Worse Off than in Liquidation" claims in the event that a CCP is resolved rather than being liquidated.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More