ARTICLE
3 August 2020

When Teaser Ads Are Just Too Sexy

FK
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

Contributor

Frankfurt Kurnit provides high quality legal services to clients in many industries and disciplines worldwide. With leading practices in entertainment, advertising, IP, technology, litigation, corporate, estate planning, charitable organizations, professional responsibility and other areas — Frankfurt Kurnit helps clients face challenging legal issues and meet their goals with efficient solutions.
The Department of Justice, on behalf of the FTC, has sued a marketer of background reports, alleging that the company deceived consumers with "teaser background reports"...
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Department of Justice, on behalf of the FTC, has sued a marketer of background reports, alleging that the company deceived consumers with "teaser background reports" that often falsely claimed to include information about individuals' arrest, criminal, and sex offender records, and engaged in misleading billing and marketing practices.

According to the complaint, filed in the Central District of California, the marketer sells consumer background reports through the website, www.mylife.com. The site allows users to run free background searches on individuals.  Defendants promote the use of MyLife background reports for use in determining an individual's eligibility for employment, loans, and housing. 

When a user would search an individual's name, the search results would include a "Teaser Background Report" with a "Reputation Score" about the individual purportedly based on "public information, gathered from government, social, and other sources, plus personal reviews written by others."  Even if the searched-for individual had no history of offenses, or only minor ones, the Teaser report would suggest that the individual had serious ones which the user could learn more about by buying a subscription.  And, as alleged, those subscriptions were sold with incomplete disclosures and when users would try to cancel them, would have a very hard time doing so. 

MyLife also conducted outbound telemarketing campaigns to prospective customers. On those calls, MyLife allegedly made materially misleading and deceptive statements and omissions, including about the benefits of a subscription and about MyLife's cancellation and refund policies and practices.

All of these practices resulted in lawsuits against MyLife by consumers and regulators, although apparently not enough to stop them; hence, this lawsuit.  The complaint alleges violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, ROSCA, the TSR and the FCRA and seeks injunctive relief, restitution and civil penalties.

Originally published 31 July, 2020

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More