ARTICLE
3 January 2020

TTAB Orders Cancellation Of Part Of POLO GIRLS Registration Due To Nonuse

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Contributor

For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
The Board granted in part this petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark POLO GIRLS for "Organizing and conducting...
United States Intellectual Property

The Board granted in part this petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark POLO GIRLS for "Organizing and conducting polo sporting events for the purpose of fundraising; Entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of polo sports events, and polo lifestyle," finding that Respondent Elizabeth Scripps did not use the mark for television entertainment on or before her date of filing the underlying application. However, as to the services of organizing and conducting polo events for fund raising, the Board ruled that Scripps had not abandoned the mark despite two years of nonuse because she did not have an intent not to resume use. American Polo Association, LLC v. Elizabeth Scripps, Cancellation No. 92066032 (December 19, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. Thurmon). [Correction to final decision here].

Nonuse: The evidence showed that Scripps "hoped to produce an ongoing television program, but had not done so on or before the application filing date." She produced three short, unconnected videos that did not constitute the "ongoing television programs" that she claimed. And so the Board granted the petition for cancellation as to these services.

Abandonment: As the services of organizing and conduction polo events, Scripps did use the mark before her filing date. Petitioner failed to prove a three-year period of nonuse, and so the statutory presumption of abandonment was not applicable. Instead, petitioner had to establish that Scripps stopped using the mark with an intent not to resume use.

The evidence did establish that Scripps stopped using the mark for two years. However, Respondent Scripps presented unrebutted testimony that she "experienced severe, life threatening medical issues" during that period. [The Board stated in a footnote that this testimony explained and excused the period of nonuse.]  Other evidence, including emails and Facebook posts, showed that she did not intent not to resume use. There was no evidence that she did.

And so the Board denied the petition for cancellation as to Scripps' services of organizing and conduction polo events.

Read comments and post your comment here.

The TTABlog

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More