ARTICLE
1 August 2024

Court Of Appeal Upholds High Court Decision In Virgin Media's Appeal

NR
Norton Rose Fulbright Hong Kong

Contributor

Norton Rose Fulbright provides a full scope of legal services to the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions. The global law firm has more than 3,000 lawyers advising clients across more than 50 locations worldwide, including London, Houston, New York, Toronto, Mexico City, Hong Kong, Sydney and Johannesburg, covering Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East. With its global business principles of quality, unity and integrity, Norton Rose Fulbright is recognized for its client service in key industries, including financial institutions; energy, infrastructure and resources; technology; transport; life sciences and healthcare; and consumer markets.

The Court of Appeal has ruled that all rule amendments to contracted-out DB schemes between 1997 and 2013 do need written actuarial confirmation that the reference scheme test continues to be satisfied.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal has ruled that all rule amendments to contracted-out DB schemes between 1997 and 2013 do need written actuarial confirmation that the reference scheme test continues to be satisfied.

The decision in Virgin Media Limited v NTL Pensions Trustees II Limited means amendments could be void whether they related to past or future service benefits, and even where such amendments were benefit improvements.

Comment

It is unclear whether there will be a further appeal by the employer to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the decision is likely to cause major issues for contracted-out DB schemes unless the DWP steps in urgently to provide a solution.

The DWP has the power to validate scheme amendments retrospectively, which could be the swiftest and most satisfactory resolution to what will otherwise be a huge and wide-ranging problem.

Without intervention from the DWP, the ramifications of calling into question past amendments are likely to create an enormous work overload for scheme trustees and administrators who are already dealing with major projects such as the scheme funding regime, GMP equalisation and dashboard implementation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More