ARTICLE
5 March 2025

Thatchers vs Aldi: Trade Mark Infringement Or Healthy Competition?

E
ENS

Contributor

ENS is an independent law firm with over 200 years of experience. The firm has over 600 practitioners in 14 offices on the continent, in Ghana, Mauritius, Namibia, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda.
In the ongoing legal saga between Thatchers Cider and Aldi, the latest ruling by the High Court of London has put a spotlight on trade mark rights...
United Kingdom Intellectual Property

In the ongoing legal saga between Thatchers Cider and Aldi, the latest ruling by the High Court of London has put a spotlight on trade mark rights and the importance of protecting a brand's reputation.

1593002a.jpg

*Image credit

The background

Thatchers, a well-established Somerset-based cider company, filed a trade mark infringement lawsuit against Aldi after the supermarket chain launched its Taurus Cloudy Lemon Cider, which Thatchers claimed closely resembled their own product. The issue? Aldi's use of similar packaging and branding that could potentially confuse consumers.

The court ruling

In the most recent decision, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Thatchers, finding that Aldi had indeed infringed upon Thatchers trade mark. The court found that Aldi intentionally used packaging that reminded consumers of Thatchers established brand, aiming to capitalize on its reputation without making the necessary investment or taking the commercial risks of creating a unique product.

Lord Justice Arnold emphasised that Aldi's use of Thatchers "sign" was unfair competition, stating that it was intended to take advantage of Thatcher's investment in its product, even though Aldi did not intend to confuse consumers about the origin of the product.

What does this mean for trade mark protection?

This case is a powerful reminder of the importance of trade mark protection in safeguarding a brand's unique identity. When a business invests time, money, and effort into creating a distinct product or service, they must have legal means to prevent others from riding on the coattails of their success.

For businesses, this case underscores the value of registering trade marks for not only product names but also packaging and logos. It also serves as a warning to competitors looking to mimic well-established brands: doing so could result in costly legal battles.

The takeaway

Brand owners, especially those in competitive industries, must be vigilant in protecting their trade marks. This decision sends a strong message to those considering "lookalike" products: don't expect to get away with unfairly taking advantage of someone else's hard-earned reputation.

In the end, protecting trade marks isn't just about stopping imitation – it's about fostering fair competition.

Read the full judgment here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More