In this 18th episode of our series of commercial litigation update podcasts, we consider a significant recent decision on representative actions under CPR Part 19, cases on disclosure and judgments handed down under embargo, and a Supreme Court decision on unjust enrichment.
This episode is hosted by Anna Pertoldi, a partner in our litigation team, who is joined by Maura McIntosh, a professional support consultant, and Ben Phillips, an associate.
Our podcast is available on iTunes, Spotify and SoundCloud and can be accessed on all devices. A new episode is released every couple of months. You can subscribe and be notified of all future episodes.
Below you can find links to our blog posts on the developments and cases covered in this podcast.
- High Court allows claim in respect of secret commissions to proceed as "opt-out" representative action under CPR 19.6
- High Court underlines need to consider scope of agency in considering whether documents to which agent has access are in principal's control
- Court of Appeal confirms refusal of anti-suit injunction to restrain US s.1782 discovery application in libel proceedings
- Court of Appeal finds disclosure to party's US lawyers breached embargo on draft judgment, but no further steps taken
- Supreme Court finds no entitlement to payment in circumstances not addressed by express contractual terms
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
