ARTICLE
25 October 2014

More Data Protection Issues For Google – The Hegglin Case

WB
Wedlake Bell

Contributor

Wedlake Bell logo
We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future. With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution. Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic. Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
There has been a fair amount of comment about the recent European Court decision which effectively forces Google (and others, we must say) to delete personal data which may no longer be relevant.
United Kingdom Privacy

There has been a fair amount of comment about the recent European Court decision which effectively forces Google (and others, we must say) to delete personal data which may no longer be relevant.

The requirement to delete irrelevant personal data is just one consequence for Google of the decision which says that it is bound by the European Directive on Data Protection.

The English Court seems to have rubber stamped two others recently – sections 10 and 14 of the Data Protection Act1.  The Court, in an interim decision, has intimated that Google will probably be obliged to prevent the processing of personal data which is inaccurate and/or causes substantial damage or distress, whether that be on websites which it hosts or through the search engine which it operates.

While the decision has yet to be made final, it will offer encouragement to individuals to request, and if necessary sue, Google (and other organisations) in order to remove abusive, defamatory or false allegations from the public domain and has the potential to have a similar impact to that of Gonzalez on the business of Google and other data controllers.

Footnote

1 See Hegglin -v- (1) Person(s) Unknown and (2) Google Inc [2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More