ARTICLE
18 December 2025

EDPB Weighs In: When Is An E-Commerce Account Truly Necessary?

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
The European Data Protection Board ("EDPB") recently published recommendations relating to mandatory user accounts on e-commerce platforms. These recommendations establish a strict standard for when an organisation...
United Kingdom Privacy
Miriam Everett’s articles from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Privacy topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Transport industries
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP are most popular:
  • within Privacy, Transport and Antitrust/Competition Law topic(s)

The European Data Protection Board ("EDPB") recently published recommendations relating to mandatory user accounts on e-commerce platforms. These recommendations establish a strict standard for when an organisation can rely on the legal basis of "necessity for the performance of a contract" (Article 6(1)(b) of the GDPR) in order to impose the creation of permanent user accounts.

The necessity principle

At the core of the EDPB's position is the principle of data protection by design (Article 25 of the GDPR). The guidance suggests that a "guest mode" checkout is the most privacy-protective option and should be the default, as it minimizes the amount of data collected and stored persistently.

The EDPB scrutinizes whether mandatory account creation is strictly necessary to fulfill the specific request made by the user. If an action — such as completing a one-time sale — can be performed without creating a persistent, identifiable profile, then mandating an account is likely to be deemed disproportionate and risky under current GDPR enforcement interpretations.

Scenarios where persistent user accounts are justified (lower risk)

The recommendations outline limited situations where the creation of a persistent user account is considered necessary because recurrent, authenticated interaction is intrinsic to the nature of the service itself:

  • Subscription Services: Where the contractual obligation involves ongoing, authenticated access to content or services over a defined period (e.g. streaming platforms, software-as-a-service).
  • Closed Community Access: Services that are explicitly limited to a closed, verified user group based on professional status, invitation, or other predefined criteria.

Scenarios where persistent user accounts are not necessary (higher risk)

The EDPB provides examples of common e-commerce activities where mandatory account creation is viewed as not necessary to fulfill the contractual obligation of the transaction. Relying on contract performance or legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f)) in these situations could present a heightened compliance risk:

  • One-Time Sales: Completing a single purchase or transaction.
  • Order Tracking: Providing shipment status updates (which can be facilitated via an emailed link without a login).
  • Post-Sale Functions: Managing common after-sales requests, such as returns, warranty claims, or processing GDPR data subject requests.
  • Internal Obligations: Fulfilling technical requirements like generating invoices for tax/accounting purposes or general fraud prevention measures.
  • Personalization: Providing non-essential, personalized product recommendations during the checkout process.

Compliance Strategy

For organisations whose e-commerce flow currently mandates the creation of an account before making a purchase, the EDPB's guidance suggests two paths:

  1. Implement Guest Checkout: This is widely viewed as the safest path to immediate compliance. While personal data necessary for shipping and payment (name, address, etc.) can still be collected under the contract basis, no persistent user account profile is created unless the user actively consents.
  2. Document a Detailed Necessity Defence: If mandatory account creation is deemed business-critical and impossible to bypass, the organization should formally document a necessity test. This documentation should detail why a guest checkout is technically or legally impossible for specific, non-marketing purposes and prepare to defend this position against regulatory scrutiny.

The EDPB has opened a public consultation on these recommendations until 12 February 2026. This provides a valuable opportunity for organisations to submit strategic feedback on the operational impact, particularly concerning activities (like fraud prevention or long-term warranty management) that the EDPB currently views as "not necessary."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More