ARTICLE
11 May 2015

Focus Antitrust - 29 April 2015

CR
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Contributor

We are an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the intersection of personal, family and business. We have a broad range of skills and collective legal expertise and experience with an international outlook across the full spectrum of business and personal needs. Our firm is headquartered in London with offices across the UK, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. Whether your business operates in a single country or across borders, we’ll put together your perfect team – pulling from our sector and geographical expertise and our partnerships with the best law firms across the world covering 200 legal jurisdictions.

The CMA has formally cleared the completed acquisition by Xchanging of certain companies comprising all of the European operations of Agencyport.
United Kingdom Antitrust/Competition Law

In The News

CMA formally clears specialist insurance merger

The CMA has formally cleared the completed acquisition by Xchanging of certain companies comprising all of the European operations of Agencyport.  The decision confirms the provisional findings which were published last month, when the inquiry group of independent panel members examining the merger provisionally concluded that it would not result in a substantial lessening of competition.  Click here

EU

Articles 101 and 102

  • The European Court of Justice has dismissed an appeal by LG against a General Court judgment that upheld the main parts of the European Commission's decision on the liquid crystal display (LCD) panels cartel. The ECJ agreed with the General Court that the Commission was entitled, in calculating the fine, to take into account sales of LCD panels made by LG to its parent companies. This was on the basis that those sales were to be regarded as sales made to independent third parties and not as sales made to entities belonging to the same undertaking, because LG does not form a single undertaking with its parent companies.  Click here.
  • An Advocate General's opinion has been issued which concludes that it is irrelevant how many consumers are affected when assessing the application of Article 101 to an agreement that amounts to a restriction of competition by object.  Click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More