ARTICLE
27 November 2020

With ComparetheMarket Having Being Fined Millions By The CMA, Nicola Sharp Of Business Crime Specialists Rahman Ravelli Emphasises The Need To Comply With Competition Law

RR
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors

Contributor

Rahman Ravelli is known for its sophisticated, bespoke and robust representation of corporates, senior business executives and professionals in national and international matters.
It is one of the fastest-growing and most highly-regarded, market-leading legal practices in its field. This is due to its achievements in criminal and regulatory investigations and large-scale commercial disputes involving corporate wrongdoing and multi-jurisdictional enforcement, and its asset recovery, internal investigations and compliance expertise.
The firm’s global reach, experienced litigators and network of trusted partner firms ensure it can address legal matters for clients anywhere in the world. It combines astute business intelligence and shrewd legal expertise with proactive, creative strategies to secure the best possible outcome for all its clients.
Rahman Ravelli’s achievements in certain cases have even helped shape the law. It is regularly engaged by other law firms to provide independent advice.

ComparetheMarket has been fined £17.9 million by the Competition and Markets Authority for clauses in its contracts that breached competition law.
United Kingdom Antitrust/Competition Law

ComparetheMarket has been fined £17.9 million by the Competition and Markets Authority for clauses in its contracts that breached competition law.

An investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) found that, from December 2015 to December 2017, the price comparison website broke competition law by imposing clauses on home insurance providers selling on its site. These clauses prevented the insurers offering lower prices on other comparison websites.

This strategy ensured ComparetheMarket was not undercut by rival price comparison websites. The clauses also made it difficult for those rival sites to challenge the strong position in the market that ComparetheMarket had established. 

As competition between price comparison websites - and between home insurers selling through those sites - was limited as a result of this, the CMA found that ComparetheMarket's approach was likely to have resulted in higher insurance premiums.

Michael Grenfell, the CMA's Executive Director for Enforcement, said it was unacceptable that ComparetheMarket used clauses in its contracts to prevent home insurers offering bigger discounts on competing websites, as it limited the favourable deals that could have been available to consumers.

This recent decision should come as a stark warning to others. With price comparison sites being such a useful tool for the public, it is good to see that the CMA is taking steps to clamp down on unfair practices, which are ultimately detrimental to the consumer. This is especially important during these difficult times of pandemic, when many people are looking to reduce the amounts they have to pay for things such as home insurance

It is likely that this case will be followed by further investigations, which may lead to further fines. With fines capable of being up to 10% of worldwide group turnover, this is an issue that digital comparison sites should be taking very seriously.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More