ARTICLE
14 June 2024

Supreme Court Verdict On Karasjok Case: Finnmarkseiendommen Acquitted

Read about the Supreme Court's 2024 verdict on the Karasjok case where Finnmarkseiendommen (FeFo) was acquitted in a significant land rights dispute.
Norway Real Estate and Construction

Read about the Supreme Court's 2024 verdict on the Karasjok case where Finnmarkseiendommen (FeFo) was acquitted in a significant land rights dispute.

Background of the Karasjok Legal Dispute

Hjort has successfully assisted Finnmarkseiendommen (FeFo) in the notable Karasjok case. The Supreme Court, sitting as a grand chamber, delivered its verdict on 31 May 2024, in the case referenced as HR-2024-982-S. This landmark decision saw the Supreme Court acquitting Finnmarkseiendommen (FeFo) from the local population's claims over property rights to the unsold land within the municipality.

Details of the Supreme Court's Decision

The case, which has been ongoing since 2019, centers around an extensive area of approximately 5361 square kilometers, representing 98.3% of the municipality's total area. The legal representation for FeFo was provided by Hjort's lawyers Frode A. Innjord and Rune Mykkeltvedt. Initially, the Finnmark Commission, under a dissenting opinion of 3/2, ruled that the disputed area was collectively owned by the local community. This decision was upheld by the Finnmark Land Tribunal in 2023, also with a dissenting opinion of 3/2.

Key Points from the Supreme Court's Ruling

Over eight court days, from 29 February to 11 March 2024, the Supreme Court deliberated and ultimately sided with FeFo. The court affirmed that the State – the King – had acquired property rights to the land in inner Finnmark, including Karasjok, as early as 1751 when the area came under Norwegian jurisdiction. The local population retained rights of use and commons, but these did not evolve into property rights over time. The court also referenced ILO Convention No. 169, clarifying that it did not support a different outcome in this case.

Implications and Next Steps

The Supreme Court did not address the local population's subsidiary claim for collective usage rights with administrative rights and referred this matter back to the Finnmark Land Tribunal for further consideration.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Find out more and explore further thought leadership around Real Estate Law and Construction Law

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More