ARTICLE
2 April 2025

LD Brussels, March 21, 2025, Order On Application For Provisional Measures, UPC_CFI_582/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
The preliminary objection pursuant to R. 19.(b) RoP relates to proceedings on the merits. This is based on procedural economy and the (extended) timeframe...
Belgium Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Rule 19.1(b) RoP does not apply to objections to provisional measures due to their expedited nature

The preliminary objection pursuant to R. 19.(b) RoP relates to proceedings on the merits. This is based on procedural economy and the (extended) timeframe within which the
parties in infringement actions, revocation actions and actions for declaration of non-infringement must present their arguments. An application for "provisional" measures does not follow such an extended timeframe, because the procedure itself already follows an accelerated timeframe ("summary procedure").

On Urgency: The objective earliest filing date for a UPC action is the European patent's grant date, not the date when the unitary effect was registered

An applicant is expected to be diligent in seeking a remedy against the alleged infringer, having gathered all necessary evidence, from the moment the infringement began or from the time the applicant became aware of said infringement. If the applicant has acted negligently or hesitated in requesting provisional measures after gathering all the necessary elements for a promising legal action (from an objective standpoint), it must be concluded that the applicant was not genuinely interested in promptly enforcing its rights. In such circumstances, it would be inappropriate for the Court to grant the requested provisional legal protection.

Since the UPC has substantive jurisdiction to hear infringement actions or provisional measures for European patents (Art. 3(c) UPCA in conjunction with Art. 32(1)(a) or (c) UPCA), it is not the date of the registration of the unitary effect that should be considered as the objective earliest date for filing an action with the UPC (either an action for infringement (Art. 32(1)(a) UPCA) or an action for provisional measures (Art. 32(1)(c) UPCA), but the date when the European Patent was granted.

2. Division

Local Division Brussels

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_582/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Application for provisional measures

5. Parties

Applicant: BARCO NV

Defendants: YEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd. and YEALINK (EUROPE) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY BV

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 732 827

7. Body of legislation / Rules

R. 19.1 RoP; R. 206.1 RoP; R. 211.1 RoP

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More