From 26 June 2021, a new prudential regime applies to investment firms authorised under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive ("MiFID II").
This new framework, set out in the Investment Firm Regulation ("IFR") and the Investment Firm Directive ("IFD"), significantly revises the prudential rulebook for investment firms by introducing a bespoke regime.
Underpinned by the principles of risk relevance and proportionality, the new regime applies a range of rules relating to capital requirements, financial and regulatory reporting, internal governance and remuneration to investment firms, depending on their classification across a risk spectrum.
Classification of Investment Firms
Depending on size, scale and activities, investment firms fall into one of three categories under the IFD / IFR regime: Class 1; Class 2 and Class 3.
Class 1 firms are systemically important firms that are authorised to deal on their own account or underwrite or place financial instruments on a firm commitment basis and whose total assets exceed €30 billion (individually or on a group basis).
These firms are subject to European Central Bank supervision and must now apply for authorisation as a credit institution. Until the new licence is issued, they remain subject to the Capital Requirements Directive ("CRD") and the Capital Requirements Regulation ("CRR") capital and remuneration requirements that applied prior to 26 June 2021.
Class 1 minus firms are investment firms authorised to deal on their own account or underwrite or place financial instruments on a firm commitment basis and whose total value of consolidated assets exceeds €15 billion but does not meet the €30 billion Class 1 threshold.
These firms continue to be regulated under CRD / CRR and remain subject to CRD / CRR capital and remuneration requirements.
Class 2 firms are investment firms that are not systemically important and which exceed certain size and risk thresholds.
This is expected to be the default category for many investment firms.
Class 2 firms are subject to IFD / IFR supervisory and remuneration requirements (unless part of a group that is subject to consolidated supervision under the CRD / CRR).
Class 2 firms are required to hold minimum own funds based on the higher of their fixed overhead requirement ("FOR"), their permanent minimum capital ("PMC") requirement or a new 'K-factor' own funds requirement.
The K-factors are a set of metrics used to determine the capital requirements for a firm, depending on the range and extent of services the firm provides.
Class 3 firms are small and non-interconnected firms which do not meet certain thresholds. These are subject to reduced and modified IFD / IFR requirements (unless part of a group that is subject to consolidated supervision under CRD / CRR requirements).
Class 3 firms are required to hold minimum own funds based on the higher of their FOR requirement or their PMC.
They are not required to calculate their capital based on the K-factor methodology but still need to calculate K-factors for categorisation purposes.
Class 3 firms continue to be subject to the MiFID remuneration requirements and not the IFD / IFR remuneration framework.
The IFD / IFR introduce remuneration requirements including deferral, payment in instruments and remuneration committees for many investment firms. Consistent with the principle of proportionality, the governance and remuneration requirements will depend on a firm's classification and balance sheet size.
The Central Bank of Ireland ("Central Bank") intends to issue an 'Implementation of NCA Discretions in IFD / IFR Regulatory Notice' in due course to set out how it will exercise the Member State remuneration related discretions to be granted to it by the Irish Minister of Finance.
National Implementation: Ireland
IFR and IFD entered into force on 25 December 2019. IFR is directly effective from 26 June 2021 and EU Member States are expected to apply domestic legislation implementing IFD from 26 June 2021.
The Irish Department of Finance issued a Feedback Statement on 24 May 2021 on the outcome of its public consultation on the national discretions under IFD in May 2020. For further details see our client update Ireland Exercises National Discretions under IFD / IFR.
Irish-implementing legislation is expected shortly.
On 23 June 2021, the Central Bank issued a Feedback Statement providing further guidance on how it will exercise competent authority discretions in the IFR and IFD.
Noting that the transposition into Irish law of IFD Articles 60 and 61 will amend own funds requirements for AIFMs and UCITS management companies with MiFID II top-up permissions, the Central Bank has clarified that such entities should continue to comply with the current prudential regime specified in their conditions of authorisation pending further Central Bank engagement.
What should investment firms do?
To ensure compliance with the IFD / IFR regime, investment firms should familiarise themselves with the IFD / IFR requirements and the potential impact on their business.
This may involve the following initial considerations:
- Assessment of the firm in the context of Class 1 / 2 / 3 categorisation
- Review of the applicable minimum capital requirements
- Revision of the firm's remuneration policies and procedures / framework
- Preparing for the new regulatory reporting regime that the firm is subject to
Any gaps identified in the current business model should be remediated and policies and procedures should be updated to ensure compliance.
In January 2021, the Central Bank indicated that investment firms' preparation for the IFD / IFR should be discussed at board level.
A Central Bank statement on 14 July 2021 reminded relevant firms to engage with the European Banking Authority data collection exercise (as part of its second consultation on the draft RTS on the calculation of the threshold in Article 8a(1) of CRD) as communicated to them by their supervisory team and to confirm their IFD / IFR classification to that team by the end of August 2021.
How Maples Can Help
Our dedicated Irish Financial Services Regulatory Group is currently working with a number of firms implementing the new regime, including: reviewing remuneration framework and employment terms; engaging with the Central Bank; assessing re-categorisation of firms and relevant thresholds (particularly within group contexts); advising clients on interpreting key provisions; and how the Department of Finance and the Central Bank intend to exercise national discretions.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.