ARTICLE
11 November 2019

The Persistence Of Memory May Not Get You Off The Hook

MM
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
Contributor
Founded in 1919, McLane Middleton, Professional Association has been committed to serving their clients, community and colleagues for over 100 years.  They are one of New England’s premier full-service law firms with offices in Woburn and Boston, Massachusetts and Manchester, Concord and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. 
It appears it may be more difficult for former employees to utilize certain "remembered information" obtained through previous employment for the benefit of their new employer.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Published in North of Boston Business Magazine (Fall 2019)

It appears it may be more difficult for former employees to utilize certain "remembered information" obtained through previous employment for the benefit of their new employer. This is particularly so where that information may be defined as  "Confidential Information" subject to a written employment agreement.

In a recent court case the ex-employee's clients came to him almost exclusively through the internal operations of his employer, and not "cold calls" made by the employee himself.  When the employee resigned and went to work for a direct competitor, he created a written list of clients from his old firm which he claimed to have prepared entirely from memory.  He gave the list to his new employer who then filled it out using publicly available sources.  Subsequently, the former employee used the list to contact the clients.

Not surprisingly, the former employer sued for violation of an fairly typical employment agreement containing a proscription against client solicitation.  The Court found that the identities of the clients constituted "Confidential Information" even where the information resided solely in the former employee's memory.  The Court expressly rejected arguments which denied any liability based upon only "remembered information," a defense which has been well recognized and utilized successfully in the past.

The former employee also claimed that all he did was call his former clients and tell them he had gone to another firm, unless the client requested additional information.  The Court found that these client contacts were effectively solicitations. The calls were designed to persuade the clients to transfer their accounts, not just to inform them of the employee's new position.  Such verbal departure announcements are clearly problematic.

The bottom line: Massachusetts employees who are planning to depart for a competing business should have any written agreement carefully scrutinized, and should discuss with counsel the viability of using "remembered information" to avoid winding up in court.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
11 November 2019

The Persistence Of Memory May Not Get You Off The Hook

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
Founded in 1919, McLane Middleton, Professional Association has been committed to serving their clients, community and colleagues for over 100 years.  They are one of New England’s premier full-service law firms with offices in Woburn and Boston, Massachusetts and Manchester, Concord and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. 
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More