Written by Stephen Weyer, editor of our brother-blog OP-IP. Check it out at http://op-ip-law.blogspot.com/.
United States' lovers of authentic, original British Cadbury chocolate will have to book a flight to the UK to enjoy the cherished confection. Hershey's, manufacturing licensee of Cadbury's chocolate in the U.S., uses a different recipe than the one Cadbury uses in the UK. Not surprising to many, the first ingredient to Hershey's made U.S. Cadbury chocolate is sugar, whereas milk is the first ingredient in Briton-made Cadbury. Chocolate connoisseurs say that Briton-made Cadbury chocolate tastes creamer and is smother than U.S. Cadbury chocolate made by Hershey's. These British chocolate aficionados argue that U.S. Cadbury chocolate is pure humbug.
Hershey's was concerned that if Briton-made Cadbury chocolate, made with a different recipe, was imported into the U.S., Americans would be confused and mislead by two different chocolate experiences. As the U.S. trademark licensee of Cadbury, Hershey's believes that two different tasting chocolate would negatively affect its licensed intellectual property.
However, as a lover of chocolate, might there not be a middle ground betwixt unrestricted Briton-made Cadbury flooding into the U.S. and a complete abolition of the milky-sweet delight? Can't we have our cake and eat it too? Options include special labeling of U.S. imported Briton-made Cadbury chocolate so that unsuspecting U.S. consumers who like their current U.S. (Hershey's made) Cadbury chocolate will not be confused with Briton-made Cadbury chocolate.
The lawyers at Trademarkology provide trademark registration services backed by the experience and service of one of the nation's oldest law firms. Click here to begin the process of protecting your brand name with a federally registered trademark.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.