ARTICLE
14 May 2025

Limited Grants Of Administration: A Practical Overview

Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC (Clerides Legal)

Contributor

Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC was founded in 1950. The firm was carried forward by the son of Phoebus Clerides – Dr. Christos Clerides of King’s College London. Phoebus Clerides was an ex-Minister of Justice and an ex-member of the House of Representatives. Dr. Christos Clerides was also an ex-member of the House of Representatives and the National Council of Cyprus, as well as President of the Cyprus Bar Association. Currently the office is lead by the third generation of advocates, Phoebe Cleridou, Alexandros Clerides and Constantinos Clerides. It has been active for 74 consecutive years in the provision of legal advice, services, and in the management and resolution of disputes with a specialisation in litigation. Out of court the firm provides advice in relation to corporate, commercial and related matters. In light of its long existence, the firm is active in all legal areas and is staffed with 16 professionals.
Section 19 of the Administration of Estates Law, Cap. 189 empowers the Court to issue limited grants of representation that are...
Cyprus Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A concise guide for practitioners and stakeholders

1| Statutory basis

Section 19 of the Administration of Estates Law, Cap. 189 empowers the Court to issue limited grants of representation that are:

  • time‑bound (pendentelite),
  • restricted to specific assets, or
  • confined to a special purpose (adlitem, adcolligenda bona, etc.).

Cypriot courts, following TerzianvTerzian (2003) 1Β ΑΑΔ 1252, look to English probate practice for guidance unless local rules dictate otherwise.

2| When a limited grant is appropriate

Form Typical trigger Ends automatically when...
Pendete lite Probate dispute or will contest Final judgment is delivered
Ad litem Ongoing or impending litigation The action is finally disposed of
Ad colligenda bona Perishable/endangered assets Collection and safeguarding complete

A limited grant should be sought only when (i) no general administrator exists, and (ii) the intended step cannot wait for a full grant.

3| Key principles distilled from case‑law

  • Necessity & proportionality – The court will refuse over‑broad applications.
  • Neutrality preferred – A nominee should, where possible, be independent (PatsalidesvKyriakides (1985) 2 JSC 613).
  • Consent essential – No person can be compelled to accept a grant (NicoletteAretivMarfinPopularBank, App. 178/2011).
  • Creditors as administrators – Permitted only exceptionally; the applicant must justify why a neutral nominee is unavailable (Re Atherton'sGoods (1892) P 104).

4| Procedure snapshot

  1. Ex‑parte affidavit verifying death, absence of full grant, need for limited grant, and written consent of the proposed administrator.
  2. Filing of a draft order precisely limiting duration, assets and purpose.
  3. Service on those entitled to a general grant—unless urgency justifies dispensation.
  4. Security is usually waived for "nil estate" grants.

5| The limited administrator's role

A grantee adlitem or pendentelite:

  • acts only for the stated purpose (e.g. serving or receiving statutory notices, defending a claim);
  • owes no general fiduciary duties to realise or distribute the estate (AndromachiMinavNBG (Cyprus), App. 376/2011);
  • automatically ceases to act once the purpose is fulfilled or the time limit expires.

6| Common pitfalls

  • Over‑broad drafting ("to act generally on behalf of the estate").
  • Conflicted nominee without cogent explanation.
  • Failure to notify relatives entitled to a full grant.

7| Objecting—or not

Valid objections include: an unnecessary grant where a full administrator is ready to act; a plainly conflicted nominee; or an order wider than the stated purpose. Conversely, collateral disputes (e.g. separate settlement agreements) rarely defeat a tightly drafted limited‑grant application.

8| Final thoughts

Limited grants offer a targeted, court‑controlled solution when a procedural dead‑end threatens to stall litigation or statutory processes involving a deceased person. Precision in drafting and thoughtful choice of nominee are the twin safeguards that protect beneficiaries, creditors and third parties alike.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More