Welcome to the first 2025 edition of our Regulatory & Risk Advisory Review. In this instalment, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest regulatory developments to ensure you have the most up-to-date insights into the evolving compliance landscape.
- INCREASES TO ANNUAL FEES
The Ministry of Financial Services & Commerce announced increases to annual fees which took effect 1 January 2025. The increases are as below (in KYD):
(a) Exempted Companies:
(i) 0 to 51,219 share capital from $825 to $925
(ii) 51,220 to 1,000,000 share capital from $1,125 to $1,225
(iii) 1,000,001 to 2,000,000 share capital from $2,109 to $2,209
(iv) share capital above 2,000,001 from $2,693 to $2,793
(b) Exempted Segregated Portfolio Companies:
(i) 0 to 51,219 share capital from $2,825 to $2,925
(ii) 51,220 to 1,000,000 share capital from $3,125 to $3,225
(iii) 1,000,001 to 2,000,000 share capital from $4,109 to $4,209
(iv) share capital above 2,000,001 from $4,693 to $4,793
(c) Exempted Limited Partnerships:
(i) Regulated: annual fee increases from $1,200 to $1,300
(ii) Not Regulated: annual fee increases from $2,000 to $2,100
- FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE (FATF) UPDATES
2.1. Public Consultation on AML/CFT and Financial Inclusion – Updated FATF Guidance on AML/CFT Measures and Financial Inclusion
The FATF is considering proposals for the update of the FATF Guidance on AML/CFT measures and financial inclusion (the "updated Guidance") as part of its programme of work to address the unintended consequences of AML/CFT measures. The FATF is inviting views and comments on the updated Guidance from interested stakeholders.
The updated Guidance proposed for public consultation reflects the recently adopted amendments to the FATF Standards which have an increased focus on proportionality and simplified measures in the risk-based approach, updates the concept and state of financial inclusion and its relevance to financial integrity, as well as provides additional guidance and updated best practice examples of implementation of the risk-based approach in AML/CFT regime, with particular focus on simplified measures in lower risk scenarios.
2.2 Public Consultation on Complex Proliferation Financing (PF) and Sanctions Evasion Schemes Project
Amendments to Recommendations 1 and 2 (R.1 and R.2) and their Interpretive Notes (INR.1 and INR.2) were adopted in October 2020. The amendments require countries, financial institutions, designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to identify, assess, and understand their PF risks, i.e. the risk of potential breaches, non-implementation or evasion of the targeted financial sanctions (TFS) detailed in R.7, and to take effective mitigation measures which are commensurate to the identified risks.
The FATF is now undertaking a study aimed at improving country and private sector understanding of current PF risks. This study will detail the evasion techniques used by those evading the targeted financial sanctions detailed in Recommendation 7, which is required by the FATF Standards, as well as other national and supranational sanctions that are not covered by the FATF Standards. The resulting report will focus on providing a comprehensive up-to-date understanding of typologies in complex sanctions evasion schemes relevant to PF and identifying enforcement challenges and best practices, which helps to inform countries' PF risk assessment and risk mitigation.
To assist the production of the final report, the FATF is seeking input from the private sector and civil society on best practices in mitigating PF risk.
2.3 Second Public Consultation on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency
The FATF is holding a second round of public consultation on revisions to Recommendation 16 (R.16), its Interpretive Note (INR.16) and the related Glossary of specific terms, to adapt them to the changes in payment business models and messaging standards.
R.16/INR.16 needs to be updated to ensure that the FATF Standards remain technology-neutral and follow the principle of 'same activity, same risk, same rules'. These proposed revisions also aim to help make cross-border payments faster, cheaper, more transparent and inclusive whilst remaining safe and secure; an objective that is part of the G20 Priority Action Plan.
Before finalising the revisions to R.16/INR.16, the FATF would like to hear from all interested stakeholders, in particular from the payment industry. The updated proposed revisions are available here along with an Explanatory Memorandum that explains the policy intent of the key proposals for revisions in detail, and sets out how the responses to the first consultation in February-May 2024 have been taken into account.
2.4 Jurisdictions Subject to an FATF Call on Its Members and Other Jurisdictions to Apply Countermeasures
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)
The FATF remains concerned about DPRK's failure to address deficiencies in its anti money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime. The FATF urges countries to: (a) terminate correspondent relationships with DPRK banks; (b) close subsidiaries or branches of DPRK banks within their territories; and (c) limit business relationships and financial transactions with DPRK persons. DPRK has increased connectivity with the international financial system, raising PF risks. The FATF encourages enhanced due diligence and vigilance against DPRK's use of front companies and complex ownership structures.
Iran
Iran's action plan to address strategic deficiencies expired in January 2018, and as of February 2020, it had not completed the plan. The FATF has fully lifted the suspension of countermeasures against Iran due to its failure to enact the Palermo and Terrorist Financing Conventions. Iran remains on the FATF's high-risk jurisdictions list until it completes its full Action Plan.
Myanmar
Myanmar committed to addressing strategic deficiencies in February 2020, but its action plan expired in September 2021. Due to slow progress, the FATF calls for enhanced due diligence measures proportionate to the risks arising from Myanmar. If no further progress is made by June 2025, the FATF will consider countermeasures. Myanmar has made some recent progress in addressing technical compliance deficiencies regarding targeted financial sanctions related to PF. However, it needs to continue working on implementing its action plan, including enhancing the use of financial intelligence in investigations and increasing the freezing and confiscation of criminal proceeds. The FATF emphasises that when applying enhanced due diligence to Myanmar, countries should ensure that legitimate financial flows, such as humanitarian assistance and remittances, are not disrupted.
- CHANGE TO THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) LIST OF NON-COMPLIANT TAX JURISDICTIONS
The European Council of the EU confirmed the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes without changes. The list consists of the same 11 jurisdictions as before: American Samoa, Anguilla, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Panama, Russia, Samoa, Trinidad and Tobago, US Virgin Islands, and Vanuatu.
The Council also approved the usual state of play document (Annex II) which reflects the ongoing EU cooperation with its international partners and the commitments of these countries to reform their legislation to adhere to agreed tax good governance standards. Its purpose is to recognise ongoing constructive work in the field of taxation, and to encourage the positive approach taken by cooperative jurisdictions to implement tax good governance principles.
Costa Rica and Curaçao fulfilled their commitments by addressing the deficiencies in their automatic exchange of tax information system, and will be removed from the state of play document. Brunei Darussalam made a commitment to amend or abolish its foreign-source income exemption regime by 31 December 2025, and this commitment will be included in the state of play.
Countries remaining within the scope of the EU screening process including Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Brunei Darussalam, Eswatini, Seychelles, Turkey and Vietnam.
- LEGISLATION UPDATE
4.1. Legislative Consolidations
New revisions were released during the first quarter of 2025 for the following Acts and Regulations:
- Banks and Trust Companies Act (2025 Revision)
- Companies Act (2025 Revision)
- Companies Management Act (2025 Revision)
- Criminal Justice (International Cooperation) Act (2025 Revision)
- Exempted Limited Partnership Act (2025 Revision)
- Foundation Companies Act (2025 Revision)
- Limited Liability Companies Act (2025 Revision)
- Limited Liability Partnership Act (2025 Revision)
- Local Companies (Control) Act (2025 Revision)
- Mutual Funds Act (2025 Revision)
- Partnership Act (2025 Revision)
- Perpetuities Act (2025 Revision)
- Private Funds Act (2025 Revision)
- Proceeds of Crime Act (2025 Revision)
- Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (2024 Revision)
These revisions incorporate various amendments and updates into a revised and consolidated up to date version of each Act. A number of the amendments reflect increases in certain regulatory and corporate fees applied by authorities in relation to their services. Each revised Act should be reviewed for details on any core substantive changes.
4.2. Banks and Trust Companies (Amendment) Act, 2024
The Banks and Trust Companies (Amendment) Act, 2024, aims primarily to address the application process for licences to conduct banking or trust business within the Cayman Islands. The key purpose is to establish that the application fee for the grant of a licence is non-refundable, thereby providing clarity and certainty in the application process. The Act specifies that any person or company wishing to carry on banking or trust business must apply to the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) for a licence. The application must be in writing, include prescribed information and be accompanied by a non-refundable application fee. CIMA is empowered to grant a licence if it determines that the business will not be against the public interest, and it may impose terms and conditions as necessary.
The amendment allows CIMA to vary or revoke any conditions imposed on a licence, with reasonable notification and updates to the regulations to reflect these changes. This legislative change is intended to streamline the licensing process and ensure that the application fees contribute to the public revenue.
4.3.Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Act, 2024 (partially in force)
The Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Act, 2024, aims to amend the existing Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (2024 Revision) to enhance the regulatory framework governing virtual asset service providers in the Cayman Islands. The primary objectives of the amendment are to update and clarify definitions, improve the supervision of virtual asset activities, and ensure that fees payable under the Act are non-refundable. Additionally, the amendment seeks to address incidental and connected purposes to ensure comprehensive oversight and regulation of virtual asset service providers. The Act is designed to align with evolving technological advancements and regulatory needs in the virtual asset sector, thereby enhancing the integrity and stability of financial services involving virtual assets. Specified provisions on the Amendment Act were brought into force on 1 April pursuant to the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Act, 2024 (Commencement) Order, 2025 .
4.4. Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act, 2020 (Commencement) Order, 2025
The Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act, 2020 (Commencement) Order, 2025 commences the sections of the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act, 2020 (the "VASP Act") that comprise the virtual asset regulatory licensing regime, which will be in force from 1 April 2025. The aim of the licensing regime under the VASP Act is to embed a more comprehensive and fit for purpose regime to regulate the provision of virtual asset services in the Cayman Islands.
Once the licensing regime is in force, any providers of virtual asset custody services or operators of virtual asset trading platforms will be required to undergo a robust application process to obtain a licence from CIMA in order to provide such services. This supplements the current registration regime under the VASP Act, whereby any provider of issuance, exchange or transfer services in relation to virtual assets or of financial services in relation to an issuance or sale of a virtual asset must be registered with CIMA in order to carry out such services.
4.5. Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Legitimate Interest Access) Regulations, 2024 & Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Access Restriction) Regulations, 2024
The Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Legitimate Interest Access) Regulations, 2024 (the Legitimate Interest Access Regulations) & the Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Access Restriction) Regulations, 2024 ((the Access Restriction Regulations) commenced on 28 February 2025 and together act to supplement the Beneficial Ownership regime in the Cayman Islands in line with international standards.
The Legitimate Interest Access Regulations allow a member of the public to apply for access to the beneficial ownership register of a Cayman Islands entity. To succeed, the applicant must evidence that it has: (1) a legitimate interest in the information for the purposes of preventing, detecting, investigating, combating or prosecuting money laundering or its predicate offences or terrorism financing; and (2) that the applicant is: (a) a journalist or conducting bona fide academic research; (b) acting on behalf of a civil society organisation whose purpose includes the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorism financing; or (c) seeking the information in the context of a business relationship or transaction with the Cayman Islands entity.
The Access Restriction Regulations establish a framework for beneficial owners and senior managing officials of in-scope Cayman Islands entities to apply to protect their information from being disclosed under the Legitimate Interest Access Regulations. To successfully restrict access, the applicant needs to demonstrate that disclosure of the information would place the applicant or a member of their household at serious risk of kidnapping, extortion, violence, intimidation or any similar danger or serious harm.
Download the full report here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
