ARTICLE
20 December 2023

Reduction In Extensions Of Time Available In Trademark Oppositions And Section 45 Proceedings

AB
Aird & Berlis LLP

Contributor

Aird & Berlis is a leading Canadian law firm with offices in Toronto and Vancouver, serving clients across Canada and around the world. We provide strategic legal advice on business, regulatory, constitutional, administrative law and public policy matters. Our lawyers and intellectual property professionals represent domestic and international clients, including multinational corporations, startups, individuals, governments and Indigenous nations. Aird & Berlis advises clients in all principal areas of law, such as capital markets, corporate, financial services, real estate, Aboriginal law, projects & infrastructure, restructuring & insolvency, intellectual property, litigation, municipal, land use planning & development, tax, technology and workplace law. Aird & Berlis is recognized as one of Canada’s leading law firms by national and international guides to the legal profession, including Chambers & Partners, Best Lawyers, The Legal 500, Lexology Index and Lexpert.
On December 1, 2023, the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board reduced the extensions of time available in section 45 proceedings and trademark opposition proceedings by as much as 50 per cent.
Canada Intellectual Property

On December 1, 2023, the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board (the "Board") reduced the extensions of time available in section 45 proceedings and trademark opposition proceedings by as much as 50 per cent. While these changes are intended to facilitate more efficient proceedings and help alleviate existing backlogs and wait times, they also reduce preparation time for the parties involved. Parties should be prepared to be more proactive in the preparation of evidence and consideration of settlement in view of the shortened time frames.

Changes to Opposition Proceedings

The new statutory/administrative deadlines and available extensions of time at each stage of the proceeding are summarized in the table below.

1404250a.jpg


New Exceptional Circumstances Extension

The Board also introduced a new "exceptional circumstances" extension for instances where a party, despite acting diligently, is unable to meet a deadline. To qualify, parties must be able to demonstrate a consistent overall pattern of reasonable effort, promptness and diligence in their efforts to meet the upcoming deadline.

The request to the Registrar should clearly explain why meeting the upcoming deadline is not possible, detail the efforts made to meet it, and indicate the duration of time needed. The Board determines the appropriate length of the extension, if any.

This new exceptional circumstance extension is not intended to apply to delays caused by settlement negotiations. Rather, it is intended to apply to situations like inadvertent errors or omissions, lengthy evidence preparation processes (such as expert or survey evidence), and the unavailability of deponents if all alternative options have been exhausted. Parties must still make reasonable efforts to comply with the requirements of the Trademarks Act, RSC 1985, c T-13 and Trademarks Regulations, SOR/2018-227, and act promptly and diligently at all times.

Changes to Section 45 Proceedings

Registered owners are now only allowed a two-month (rather than four-month) benchmark extension to file evidence.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More