Should I Stay Or Should I Sell? A Narrow Standard To Refuse Sale Of The Family Home

LL
Lerners LLP

Contributor

Lerners LLP is one of Southwestern Ontario’s largest law firms with offices in London, Toronto, Waterloo Region, and Strathroy. Ours is a history of over 90 years of successful client service and representation. Today we are more than 140 exceptionally skilled lawyers with abundant experience in litigation and dispute resolution(including class actions, appeals, and arbitration/mediation,) corporate/commercial law, health law, insurance law, real estate, employment law, personal injury and family law.
A couple's home is often one of their most valuable possessions, in both a monetary and sentimental sense. Beyond the monetary value of a family home...
Canada Family and Matrimonial
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Also authored by: Megan Peters

July 7th, 2023

Navigating legal and financial issues that impact your life when your family dynamic changes can be challenging. Subscribe to FamilyMatters, our Lerners Family Law blog series, which provides insightful information and helps you determine your next steps.

A couple's home is often one of their most valuable possessions, in both a monetary and sentimental sense. Beyond the monetary value of a family home, couples frequently attach much emotional value to their homes and the memories associated with them. Thus, separating spouses may find the decision to sell a home to be emotionally challenging. Accordingly, some spouses may wish to stay in their jointly-owned homes after separation. Such situations, in which separating spouses disagree as to whether their jointly owned homes should be sold, may become complex.

SALE OF A JOINTLY OWNED HOME

In Ontario, a joint owner of a home generally has a right to sale, pursuant to the Partition Act. Correspondingly, other owners have an obligation to submit to the sale of the home. If one owner resists, a joint owner may apply to be granted a court order for sale. Courts will commonly order the sale of jointly owned homes. In rare cases, a court may, however, exercise its discretion to limit an owner's right to sale under the Partition Act. "This narrow standard for the exercise of discretion" requires a resisting party to show that the party seeking the sale was guilty of malicious, vexatious, or oppressive conduct in relation to the sale, as held by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Latcham v Latcham.

Thus, when spouses jointly own their home, a resisting spouse must show that the spouse's application for a court order for sale was brought for ulterior, improper purposes (i.e., malicious) or to harassingly re-litigate an issue (i.e., vexatious), or if the resisting spouse will suffer serious hardship due to the sale (i.e., oppression), as per the Ontario Superior Court of Justice's review of past cases in Hutchison-Perry v Perry.

SALE OF A MATRIMONIAL HOME

If a couple is married, their jointly owned home may be found to be a matrimonial home. Accordingly, unique considerations apply to determine the granting of a court order for the sale of such a home. A matrimonial home is property that was ordinarily occupied (i.e., in neither an occasional nor casual manner, as held by Ontario case law) by the married spouses as their family residence, at least at the time of the separation, per the Family Law Act. If a home is found to be a matrimonial home as contemplated by the Family Law Act, a spouse's right to its sale under the Partition Act may additionally be limited if the resisting spouse establishes that a sale would prejudice substantial rights with respect to the home under the Family Law Act, as held by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Silva v Silva.

The standard of showing such prejudice to a resisting spouse's rights is similarly narrow. For example, under the Family Law Act, a spouse has the right to apply to be granted a court order of exclusive possession of the contested matrimonial home; however, it is unlikely such a claim could singularly prevent an owner's attempt to force its sale (pursuant to the Partition Act). Indeed, in McNeil v McNeil, the wife resisting the sale of her matrimonial home wished to claim exclusive possession of the home. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice decided that she already had de facto possession of the home and that a right to exclusive possession could not be used to frustrate a spouse's right to its sale.

CONCLUSION

To summarize, the current legal landscape surrounding the rights of spouses to sell their homes is complex. When a separating couple has differing wishes concerning the sale of their home, one party may succeed in either forcing or delaying its sale depending on a number of factors, such as the ownership of the home and the couple's marital status. In cases involving jointly owned homes, courts generally have "narrow discretion" to refuse or force the sale. Courts will look to different factors to determine whether the sale of the homes of unmarried couples and married couples should be ordered. Given the intricacies of these issues, parties should consult with a lawyer for assistance in navigating this particular legal landscape.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More