A New Approach To Assessing Resource Projects Coming Down The Pipeline?

SL
Siskinds LLP

Contributor

Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
The environmental review of proposed resource projects in Canada continues to undergo changes of late.
Canada Environment

The environmental review of proposed resource projects in Canada continues to undergo changes of late.

Back in 2012, a duo of omnibus bills–Bill C-38 and Bill C-45–introduced significant changes to the way in which resource projects, such as the construction and expansion of pipelines. These changes included the scrapping and replacement of the existingfederal environmental assessment legislation and revisions to the National Energy Board Act.

These changes were problematic for a number of reasons, including for their impacts upon the NEB's ability to consider climate impacts when assessing prospective pipeline projects. Subsequent to the introduction of these changes, the NEB steadfastly refused to consider any upstream or climate impacts of any kind in its review of pipeline projects.

The recently elected Liberal government has announced changes as part of a first step towards setting the regime on a course towards incorporating climate considerations in such evaluations. This "interim" process will see that going forward, all resource projects be assessedfor upstream greenhouse gas emissions.

The interim process will affect projects that have yet to be proposed, as well as those thatare currently under review–including thehotly contested Energy East and Trans Mountain expansion projects.

It also plans to appoint a ministerial advisor who will be responsible for consulting with first nation communities along pipeline routes.

Conspicuously absent for the moment, however, has been any firm commitment to repeal the changes introduced under the omnibus bills.

Moreover, decisions pertaining to these interim assessments — to be done in addition to the NEB process — will rest with Cabinet. So the NEB's currentapproach does not appearto be directly affected.

To what extent has the pendulum actually swung? What actual, practical role will climate considerations play in these reviews?

Much remains to be seen.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

A New Approach To Assessing Resource Projects Coming Down The Pipeline?

Canada Environment

Contributor

Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More