Lerners' Appeals Netletter Video Companion - June 2014

LL
Lerners LLP

Contributor

Lerners LLP is one of Southwestern Ontario’s largest law firms with offices in London, Toronto, Waterloo Region, and Strathroy. Ours is a history of over 90 years of successful client service and representation. Today we are more than 140 exceptionally skilled lawyers with abundant experience in litigation and dispute resolution(including class actions, appeals, and arbitration/mediation,) corporate/commercial law, health law, insurance law, real estate, employment law, personal injury and family law.
Appellate lawyer, Brian Radnoff provides a summary of Lerners' Top 5 Ontario civil appeals decisions from May, 2014.
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Appellate lawyer, Brian Radnoff provides a summary of Lerners' Top 5 Ontario civil appeals decisions from May, 2014.

(1) Rajmohan v. Norman H. Solmon Family Trust, 2014 ONCA 352 - A decision involving solicitor's negligence required the Ontario Court of Appeal to consider two issues relevant to limitations - (i) the doctrine of "fraudulent concealment" and (ii) the doctrine of "special circumstances."

(2) Mandeville v. The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, 2014 ONCA 417 - A decision by a trial judge dismissing class members' claim on the basis that Manulife did not owe them a duty of care required the Ontario Court of Appeal to consider whether a company owed a of duty of care to its policyholders in connection with a legitimate transaction.

(3) Virc v. Blair, 2014 ONCA 392 - Arising out of a motion for summary judgment under Rule 16 of the Family Law Rules, the Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether Rule 16 (unlike its Rule 20 of the Rules of Civil Procedure) precludes the motions judge from assessing credibility, weighing evidence, or drawing factual conclusions.

(4) Bulut v. Carter, 2014 ONCA 424 -- A decision by a trial judge's dismissal of the action against the Carter family, required the Ontario Court of Appeal to consider two legal issues (i) the nature of the contractual defence of non est factum; and (ii) the extent to which legal issues should be set out in pleadings in order to be arguable by the party advancing them.

(5) Boucher v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2014 ONCA 419 -- A decision involving the wrongful dismissal in favour of an employee required the Ontario Court of Appeal to consider employment law and specifically the law of constructive dismissal and the availability of aggravated and punitive damages in wrongful dismissal situations.

http://lernersappeals.ca/netletters

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More