Steven Abramson

No Means No: History Of Refusing Excess Coverage Informs Whether Insured Would Have Purchased Excess Coverage

Looking For Insurance Payouts? Get In Line!

Court Of Appeal Finds Insurer Has Duty To Defend Insured In Claim Arising From Leak Of Liquid Chlorine From Its Premises Despite Pollution Liability Exclusion

Give An Inch, But They Can't Take A Mile: Where An Insurer Is Bound To Coverage Through The Implied Or Ostensible Authority Of A Broker, Coverage Will Be Limited To The Scope Of The Representation Made To The Insured

Expiry Of Limitation Period Makes Demand For Appraisal Of No Force And Effect

Consecutive Inconsistent Determinations Of An Insured's Entitlement To Statutory Accident Benefits Can Be Made Without Constituting An Abuse Of Process

Don't Lie To Your Insurer – It Doesn't Pay Well

The Right Of Equitable Contribution For Defence Costs Is Limited By The Scope Of Coverage