Article
06 Nov 2025
If You Change Your Mind: A Closer Look At CPR 36.10
AUTHORS CONTENT
Article
22 May 2025
A Bar To Recovery? Catastrophic Injury And Conditions Precedent
Article
04 Nov 2024
An IT Crowd: State Immunity And Spyware In Shehabi v Kingdom Of Bahrain
Article
29 Apr 2024
Costs, Actually: A Recap On Offers To Settle
Article
23 Feb 2024
CPR Part 47 Meets Part 36: Abridgement Of The Relevant Period, Oral Hearing Costs And Strategic Settlements
Article
17 Jan 2024
One Step Ahead: Case Summaries And Appealing Facts
Article
16 Nov 2023
The Lion's Share And The Cost Of Living: Credit Hire Revisited
Article
10 Nov 2023
The Big Short(fall): The Assessment Of Deductions From Protected Parties' Damages
Article
10 Oct 2023
The Legal Landscape Following The Supreme Court's Decision In PACCAR
Article
25 Sep 2023
Invitation To Treat? Supreme Court Clarifies The Professional Practice Test
Article
31 Jul 2023
Brew: Where Now For Litigation Funding? The Likely Impact Of The Supreme Court's Decision In R (On The Application Of PACCAR Inc And Others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal And Others [2023] UKSC 28 (Video)
Article
27 Jul 2023
Where Now For Litigation Funding? The Likely Impact Of The Supreme Court's Decision In R (on The Application Of PACCAR Inc And Others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal And Others [2023] UKSC 28
Article
11 Jul 2023
Interest-ing Time Warp? High Court Considers Link Between Conduct And Conventional Interest Rate
Article
05 May 2023
Goodbye Galloway? Tackling Negligence In Contact Sports
Article
13 Mar 2023
"A Blueprint For Action": Workplace Risk Assessments Revisited
Article
19 Aug 2022
Sands Through The Hourglass: Fatal Accidents, PDOs And Limitation
Article
02 Aug 2022
A Stitch In Time? Revisiting The "Relevant Period" Under CPR Part 36
Article
18 May 2022
J2J Clinical Negligence Webinar: Session 6 – Procedure Essentials (Video)
Article
22 Feb 2022
Benefit Of The Doubt? Update On Experts' Duties And Witness Credibility
Article
16 Feb 2022
"The Law Is Not In A State Of Flux": The Court Of Appeal Clarifies When Public Authorities May Owe A Duty Of Care