Article
13 Nov 2017
Jumping another hurdle: the Full Federal Court maintains the fine line between using Olympic themes and ambush marketing
AUTHORS CONTENT
Article
23 Apr 2017
High Court wont hear case on IP licences surviving the end of the contract
Article
16 Feb 2017
Decision that theres no copyright in digital data signals stands, following High Court rebuff
Article
22 Sep 2016
One infringement to rule them all: Federal Court finds jewellery infringes copyright in Lord of the Rings
Article
06 Sep 2016
Roger Ramsey AUSSIEMITE overpowered by Dick Smith OZEMITE: Federal Court rules on use of a trade mark
Article
14 Aug 2016
Australian Olympic Committee unable to stop Telstra's ads from "going to Rio"
Article
27 Jul 2016
Trade mark owners hit back: Court orders ISPs to block sites selling counterfeit luxury goods
Article
04 Jul 2016
No copyright in digital data signals, says Full Federal Court
Article
01 Sep 2015
Copycat building is copyright infringement, says court
Article
18 May 2015
Dallas Buyers Club v iiNet: orders made
Article
27 Apr 2015
A taxing problem of Olympic proportions: no copyright in a digital data signal
Article
14 Apr 2015
Woe betide the downloader: film studio to get IP addresses of Australian pirates
Article
08 Dec 2014
Clayton Utz wins on same test for foreign and English words as trade marks in High Court
Article
24 Apr 2014
New legislation will protect indicia and images associated with major sporting events
Article
17 Mar 2014
Foreign word trade marks: Cantarella granted application for special leave to appeal to High Court
Article
14 Dec 2013
"Whose interest is it anyway?" The Personal Property Securities Act and IP security interests
Article
26 Nov 2013
High Court rules on inadvertent disclosure of privileged material in discovery
Article
02 Apr 2013
Lost in translation: When is a foreign word mark inherently adapted to distinguish?
Article
02 Apr 2013
The Schütz v Werit patent case - a win for spare parts manufacturers or a case on its facts?
Article
19 Mar 2013
Lost in translation: When is a foreign word mark inherently adapted to distinguish goods under the Trade Marks Act?