ARTICLE
15 September 2011

Proposed Victorian Landholder Duty Model would make Victoria an unfavourable investment destination

MA
Moore Australia

Contributor

Moore Australia logo
Moore Australia part of a global network of offices, providing auditing and financial reporting services, advising local, national and international clients in the public and private sectors. Moore Australia generates annual revenues in the region of $80m. Moore Australia is part of the Moore Global network and has 14 offices with over 450 people nationwide. Moore Australia has extensive experience in state and local government, biotechnology, energy mining and renewables, health and aged care, education, manufacturing, not for profit, property and construction, retail and tourism and hospitality and has a strong presence in the following service lines: Asia Desk, Audit & Assurance, Business Advisory, Taxation, Corporate Finance, Governance and Risk Advisory.
Consultation paper released detailing the proposed changes to the Victorian land rich duty provisions
Australia Real Estate and Construction

The Victorian State Revenue Office has released a consultation paper on 8 September 2011 detailing the proposed changes to the Victorian land rich duty provisions.

The proposed changes represent a shift from the current land rich duty model to a landholder duty model and are due to come into effect from 1 July 2012.

The move to a landholder duty model mirrors the recent changes in other States and Territories (excluding Tasmania) and the State Government believes these measures will provide a simpler, efficient process. However, in our view, the proposed new landholder model does not address the complications in the current model and instead significantly broadens the number of transactions that will be subject to stamp duty thus providing increased revenue for the State Government.

Furthermore, if this proposed model is adopted, Victoria's landholder model will be the most unfavourable in comparison with other states such as NSW, Queensland and Western Australia.

Background – the current land rich model

The current Victorian land rich duty provisions broadly operate to levy duty at land transfer rates on the acquisition of significant interests in 'land rich' private companies, private unit trust schemes or wholesale unit trust schemes. A significant interest is an interest of 20% or more for private unit trusts and 50% or more for the remaining entities.  Entities are considered to be land rich where the total land holdings in Victoria exceeds $1 million or more in value and represents 60% or more of the total value of the assets held by the entity.    

Proposed Changes – the proposed landholder model

Outlined below are the proposed changes to be adopted under the landholder model. All of the changes will result in the broadening of the application of the duty provisions which will result in taxpayers paying significantly more stamp duty than under the current model.

  • Extension of Taxable Entities
    It is proposed that the landholding entities will be extended to include listed companies and listed unit trust schemes. The rate of duty for these entities will be 10% of the general rate of transfer duty.     

  • Maintenance of Land Value Threshold
    The current land holdings value threshold of $1 million or more will remain unchanged.

    By contrast the land value threshold in NSW is $2 million in unimproved value.  Queensland and Western Australia also provide a threshold of $2 million of the market value of land.

  • Removal of Land Rich Ratio
    It is proposed that the 60% landholding threshold test (i.e. land holdings must represent at least 60% of total assets) be removed. Hence, it will no longer be relevant if land is only a significant asset in comparison with the entity's remaining assets.  

    Whilst the removal of the land rich ratio is consistent with other jurisdictions, the other landholder duty models include other compensatory measures (i.e. an increased significant interest % threshold) which are not reflected in the Victorian model. 

  • Extension of Relevant Interest Definition
    Currently, in order to be subject to the land rich duty provisions, the taxpayer had to be acquiring an interest which provided them with an entitlement to a distribution of property at winding up.

    Under the proposed model, the definition of interest is to be extended to be the greater of:

    a) entitlement to a distribution of property at winding up;
    b) casting of votes at a general meeting; and
    c) entitlement to economic interests, including dividends or distributions of income

    The revised definition of interest will undoubtedly result in more taxpayers having an interest in a land rich entity.
    It is noted that South Australia is the only other jurisdiction that includes such an expansive interest definition.

  • Maintenance of Acquisition Thresholds
    It is proposed that the acquisition thresholds be maintained at 20% for unlisted trust schemes and 50% for private companies and wholesale unit trusts. A threshold of 90% will be introduced for listed entities.

    This is again a significant difference in the Victorian model against other jurisdictions (excluding the Australian Capital Territory), which all provide a 50% acquisition threshold for unlisted trust schemes as well as for private companies and wholesale unit trusts.

  • Extending the three year time frame for aggregation of interests
    Currently, in determining whether the taxpayer acquires a significant interest in the land rich entity, any interest acquired by the taxpayer within 3 years preceding the acquisition of the interest will be aggregated with the interest acquired on the particular transaction in question.

    Under the proposed model, the 3 year time cap will be removed and hence any interest acquired by the taxpayer in preceding years will be aggregated with the interest acquired on the particular transaction in question.  However, it is noted that duty will only be charged on those acquisitions occurring within the three year period.

    This will also result in the broadening of the application of the provisions. For example, if the taxpayer acquired an interest of 5% in 2000, 10% in 2009 and is planning to acquire 7% in October 2012 in a private unit trust, under the previous law, they would not be acquiring a significant interest in October (their aggregated interest would be 17%). However, under the proposed model, they would be acquiring a significant interest in October 2012 (their aggregated interest would be 22%). Hence, they would be subject to stamp duty on 17% of the land value held in the Trust.

Recommended Action

The proposed landholder duty model, in its current form, will result in a significant broadening of the tax base meaning that more entities will be subject to landholder duty.  This will impose a considerable burden on investors and leave Victoria at a comparative disadvantage to most other states.

Moore Stephens will be engaged in the submission process and will ensure that these views are expressed. Moore Stephens highly recommends that all affected parties make a submission or provide your comments to us to ensure that this proposal does not get legislated in its current form. For further information please contact Stephen O'Flynn on (03 8635 1800) or your Moore Stephens Relationship Partner.

This publication is issued by Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited ACN 062 181 846 (Moore Stephens Australia) exclusively for the general information of clients and staff of Moore Stephens Australia and the clients and staff of all affiliated independent accounting firms (and their related service entities) licensed to operate under the name Moore Stephens within Australia (Australian Member). The material contained in this publication is in the nature of general comment and information only and is not advice. The material should not be relied upon. Moore Stephens Australia, any Australian Member, any related entity of those persons, or any of their officers employees or representatives, will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with the material contained in this publication. Copyright © 2011 Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited. All rights reserved.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More