13 March 2020

The rules of evidence in NSW regarding illegally recorded surveillance footage



The case highlights the importance of thorough advice on rules of evidence and how they influence the outcome in court.
Australia Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

The High Court of Australia has recently determined that secretly recorded surveillance footage showing greyhound trainers using live bait is inadmissible according to law.

The decision is another interesting turn in a long running legal investigation into the racing industry. The High Court has been asked to intervene after the Prosecution attempted to tender footage which was illegally recorded in contravention section 8(1) of the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) as it was filmed using hidden cameras without the trainer's knowledge.

Despite the footage being illegally recorded Judges may still allow it to be admitted into evidence to be considered in court under certain circumstances. The Judge must undertake a balancing act to determine whether the public interest of the admission outweighs the illegality involved in obtaining the footage.

Ultimately the High Court decided that the surveillance footage was inadmissible however the audio recording was admissible. The case will now return to the NSW Supreme Court for determination.

This case highlights the importance of getting thorough advice on the rules of evidence and how these rules can influence an outcome in court.

Our criminal team has the unique insight of a former police officer and police prosecutor who has experience applying these rules of evidence from both perspectives.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More