Cumulative Effects In Approvals

SL
Siskinds LLP

Contributor

Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
Cumulative effects are extremely hard to manage in any approval process.
Canada Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Cumulative effects are extremely hard to manage in any approval process. By definition, the person or project seeking an individual approval does not usually control the other sources of cumulative impact. Nor is the necessary information about the other actual or potential impacts usually before the decision-maker. Occasionally, however, both of these obstacles can be overcome.

In Vasarinsh v. Niagara Escarpment Commission, the Niagara Escarpment Hearing Office declined to approve a proposed recreational development, because of the absence of sufficient evidence as to the cumulative impact of the proposed development and other phases that were predicted to follow. "In this case, ... the future development of the park is relevant to the issue of cumulative impact, given that Burlington has decided to segment the submission of development permit applications. Generally speaking, it is preferable for applicants to submit comprehensive applications for an integrated development proposal rather than to segment a project with smaller components and phases. Nevertheless, in this case there is a management plan that clearly outlines the overall design and layout of the Park. Hence the Hearing Officer has an evidentiary basis on which to examine the cumulative impact of the development as a whole.

The future plans for the site are better known in this case than in other situations where the issue of cumulative impact arises ... it is important to consider future unapproved developments that may impact the "site proper". ... while the Hearing Officer finds that the three soccer fields proposed in this present development permit application are in accordance with the Niagara Escarpment Plan, the uses for [the Park] as envisioned in the management plan are too intensive for a Park within the NEPOSS. Although major components of the present development permit application are in accordance with Niagara Escarpment Plan, the Hearing Officer finds that further development of the Park as envisioned under the management plan ... would in its totality have cumulative impacts ... not in keeping with the natural character of the escarpment environment."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Cumulative Effects In Approvals

Canada Environment

Contributor

Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More