Three Judges of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals have dismissed the American Chemistry Council's complaint challenging EPA's interim health advisory levels for PFAS in drinking water. The ACC's case was dismissed, not for perceived lack of merit, but because the Judges found that the ACC didn't have "associational standing" to bring the lawsuit in the first place.
This decision is only the most recent of several in Federal Courts ranging from the Supreme Court of the United States to Appeals Courts to District Courts more rigorously applying the constitutional requirement that a litigant allege either that a challenged action affects all of its members or that one or more specific members of the organization would have standing to challenge the action.
The courts might be less likely to be doing this if the Department of Justice wasn't pushing them to do so.
Many will applaud the Court of Appeals for ending what they see as vexatious litigation against EPA which is working hard, and taking longer than hoped, to implement its PFAS road map.
But the fact is that the Judiciary's recent more rigorous enforcement of the standing requirement will require the attention of all organizations seeking to challenge any action of the Government.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
