- within Transport and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)
Prohibited Transactions Tax Safe Harbor Holding Period Reduced to Two Years
Yesterday President Bush signed into law the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (the "Act"). The Act makes several beneficial changes to the REIT rules, incorporating most of the provisions contained in the NAREIT-sponsored "REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act" that was first proposed in 2007.
The Prohibited Transactions Safe Harbor Holding Period
For many REITs, the most significant provision in the Act shortens the prohibited transactions safe harbor holding period from four years to two. Unless the safe harbor applies, a REIT is potentially subject to a tax equal to 100% of the net income derived from a prohibited transaction (i.e., a sale of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, or "dealer property"). The prohibited transaction safe harbor used to apply to a sale of real property if, among other requirements, (i) the REIT held the property for at least four years for the production of rental income, and (ii) the aggregate expenditures made by the REIT during the four-year period preceding the date of sale that were includible in the basis of the property (i.e., capital expenditures) did not exceed 30% of the net selling price of the property. The Act shortens both the minimum holding period under the safe harbor and the period during which the limit on capital expenditures applies from four years to two. This provides REITs with significantly more flexibility to dispose of properties without risk of the 100% tax being imposed, provided the other requirements of the safe harbor are met.
REITs and other investors in real property should note, however, the safe harbor is an exception to the prohibited transaction tax only. The Act and its legislative history make clear that satisfying the safe harbor requirements does not prevent the property from being treated as dealer property for other purposes of the tax rules, including for purposes of treating the gain from the sale of the property as ordinary income rather than capital gain or as unrelated business taxable income for tax-exempt investors, including pension plan shareholders in a pension-held REIT.
It has yet to be seen what impact the changes to the safe harbor may have on the practice of REITs making sales outside the safe harbor. The new safe harbor rules apply to sales made on or after July 31, 2008.
Other Modifications of the REIT Income and Asset Tests and Prohibited Transactions Safe Harbor
The Act liberalizes certain other REIT provisions, effective for tax years beginning after July 30, 2008, except as otherwise noted below. These changes include:
- An additional requirement for a sale to qualify for the
prohibited transactions safe harbor was that the REIT must
not have made more than seven sales of property during the
applicable tax year, or, that the aggregate tax
bases of the properties sold during the taxable year must not
have exceeded 10% of the aggregate tax bases of all of the
assets of the REIT as of the beginning of the taxable year.
The Act changes the 10% limitation so that a REIT can measure
its sales based on either tax basis or fair
market value, at the REIT's annual election. This
change also applies to sales made on or after July 31, 2008,
although IRS guidance will be required to implement this
change for 2008.
- The Act increases the REIT asset test limitation with
respect to securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries
("TRS") from 20% to 25% of the REIT's
assets.
- The Act extends the "related party rent"
exception that permits leases between REITs and their TRSs
for lodging facilities to qualify as "rents from real
property" to cover healthcare facilities. Thus, a TRS
can rent a healthcare facility from its parent REIT without
disqualifying the rents paid to the parent REIT for purposes
of the 75% and 95% income tests, provided that the healthcare
facility is managed and operated by an independent contractor
and not the TRS itself. This change conforms the treatment of
healthcare facilities to lodging facilities.
- The Act broadens the REIT income tests with respect to
foreign currency exchange gain. Under existing IRS guidance,
certain foreign currency gain was treated as qualified income
in certain circumstances. Effective July 31, 2008, certain
foreign currency gain attributable to real estate income,
real estate assets or to certain indebtedness attributable to
the REIT's real estate assets is excluded from the
75% and 95% income tests, and other passive foreign currency
gain is excluded from the 95% income test.
- Effective July 31, 2008, certain hedging income that used
to be excluded from the 95% income test only is also excluded
from the 75% income test, and the exclusion is expanded to
apply to certain transactions entered into primarily to
manage the risk or currency fluctuations with respect to
items of qualifying income under the 75% or 95% income tests
(or property that generates such income or gain).
- Foreign currency is now eligible to be treated as
"cash" for purposes of the REIT asset tests, but
only in certain limited circumstances.
- The Treasury Department is now granted authority to issue
guidance providing that other items of income not expressly
provided for in the REIT rules either constitute qualifying
income for purposes of one or both of the REIT 75% and 95%
income tests or are excluded from income for purposes of one
or both of these tests. We anticipate that the IRS will use
this provision to issue guidance on Subpart F income and
income derived from an investment in a passive foreign
investment company.
Goodwin Procter LLP is one of the nation's leading law firms, with a team of 700 attorneys and offices in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, San Diego, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. The firm combines in-depth legal knowledge with practical business experience to deliver innovative solutions to complex legal problems. We provide litigation, corporate law and real estate services to clients ranging from start-up companies to Fortune 500 multinationals, with a focus on matters involving private equity, technology companies, real estate capital markets, financial services, intellectual property and products liability.
This article, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Goodwin Procter LLP or its attorneys. © 2008 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved.