- within Employment and HR topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- with readers working within the Property industries
NexusCard, Inc. ("NexusCard"), a California corporation with its principal place of business in Lake Forest, California, filed a patent infringement action on August 18, 2015, against grocery chain Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. ("Winn-Dixie"), a Florida corporation, with a principal place of business in Jacksonville, Florida, relating to 5,924,080 (the '080 Patent) directed to a computerized discount redemption system, which published on July 13, 1999. Figure 1 from the '080 Patent is reproduced below:
NexusCard asserts that the Winn-Dixie Rewards Program incorporates all the elements of several claims of the '080 Patent. As can be seen from Figure 1 above, the '080 Patent details the steps routinely employed in seemingly all retail point-of-sale rewards programs. In addition, other claims of the '080 patent cover related activities such as advertising the program and analyzing the data.
The prayer for relief does not seek lost profits, a recovery for
willful infringement, or a finding that the case is
exceptional. Instead, NexusCard merely seeks a reasonable
royalty plus prejudgment and post-judgment interest plus "such
other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
proper."
In June, NexusCard filed similar suits against other grocery and
pharmacy chains, including Kroger, Walgreens, and CVS, in the
Eastern District of Texas. Several of those cases have already been
settled and dismissed, but Kroger opted to file a motion to dismiss
on the basis that the '080 patent is directed to unpatentable
subject matter and therefore is invalid under 35 U.S.C.§ 101
in view of the Supreme Court'sguidance in Alice Corp. Pty.
Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014) and
decisions of other courts following Alice. A defendant in
a separate case filed a similar motion to dismiss, and also
asserted that NexusCard failed to state a plausible claim for
direct or indirect infringement. NexusCard filed the current suit
against Winn-Dixie while those motions to dismiss were pending,
showing no hesitation to move forward despite any concerns raised
as to the '080 patent's validity in the Texas suits.
The case is NexusCard, Inc. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., No. 4:15-cv-138, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Columbus Division, on August 18, 2015, and assigned to U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
[View Source]