EEOC Update: The Commission Rolls Out Pilot Program On Conciliating Discrimination And Harassment Allegations

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
As reported here, on May 29, 2020, EEOC Chair Janet Dhillon advised agency officials of a new, six-month pilot program changing the Commission's practices in settling workplace bias claims before pursuing litigation.
United States Employment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: As reported here, on May 29, 2020, EEOC Chair Janet Dhillon advised agency officials of a new, six-month pilot program changing the Commission's practices in settling workplace bias claims before pursuing litigation. The program is designed to "provide greater structure and transparency" in pre-suit conciliation processes and is "aimed at ensuring that unlawful employment practices are resolved more quickly." This new program is the latest in the EEOC's ongoing efforts to engage in more robust conciliation efforts prior to filing litigation on behalf of employees.

Pilot Program Procedures

While the full details of the six-month pilot program have not yet been released by the EEOC, the new procedures appear focused on enhancing oversight over the litigation selection decisions made by EEOC personnel in the field and will change how the agency conciliates discrimination and harassment allegations in an effort to "provide greater structure and transparency." In effect, this process would lessen the discretion of filed personnel to initiate lawsuits and reject settlement offers in workplace enforcement litigation.

The new program is reportedly "aimed at ensuring that unlawful employment practices are resolved more quickly, thus conserving the agency's and the parties' resources, improving workplace policies and preventing discrimination from occurring." There is also a requirement that conciliation offers be approved by a higher level of management before they are sent to employers. No more detail on these changes has yet been released.

Implications For Employers

While the full details of the program have yet to be disclosed, the changes described by the EEOC thus far appear to be positive developments for employers. The program requirements suggesting that personnel in the field must get approval from a higher level of management before making conciliation demands - or rejection of settlement proposals – will provide more clarity and assurance that a conciliation demand offered to an employer has the approval of the EEOC from the district level and will prevent last-minute changes during the negotiation process.

These new measures are the latest in a number of changes at the EEOC made by Commission Chair Dhillon (details on a recent requirement that certain cases must be approved by a Commissioner vote can be found here) and is consistent with the EEOC's strategic priorities to emphasize pre-suit conciliation. This new program is a must-watch for employers, as it could substantially impact the conciliation process with the Commission for at least the next six months.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More