ARTICLE
14 October 2020

The United States Has Devised A Plan To Help Fund Some Other Countries' Anti-Corruption Efforts

RR
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors

Contributor

Rahman Ravelli is known for its sophisticated, bespoke and robust representation of corporates, senior business executives and professionals in national and international matters.
It is one of the fastest-growing and most highly-regarded, market-leading legal practices in its field. This is due to its achievements in criminal and regulatory investigations and large-scale commercial disputes involving corporate wrongdoing and multi-jurisdictional enforcement, and its asset recovery, internal investigations and compliance expertise.
The firm’s global reach, experienced litigators and network of trusted partner firms ensure it can address legal matters for clients anywhere in the world. It combines astute business intelligence and shrewd legal expertise with proactive, creative strategies to secure the best possible outcome for all its clients.
Rahman Ravelli’s achievements in certain cases have even helped shape the law. It is regularly engaged by other law firms to provide independent advice.

The US is considering whether to use fines collected from its bribery prosecutions to help finance anti-corruption efforts abroad
United States Criminal Law

Joshua Ray Of International Business Crime Specialists Rahman Ravelli Assesses The Pros And Cons

The US is considering whether to use fines collected from its bribery prosecutions to help finance anti-corruption efforts abroad.

A bill, known as the Countering Russian and Other Overseas Kleptocracy (CROOK) Act, has been drafted with the intention of helping countries tackle corruption by both their population and foreign officials.

The US House of Representatives version of the CROOK Act would create a fund that would be used to help foreign governments adopt and uphold anti-corruption standards. This would include creating fully accountable "prosecutorial, and judicial bodies." The fund would be financed by taking 5% of each civil and criminal fine that is imposed on companies that breach the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Read the guide: Bribery & Corruption Lawyers - Responding To National And International Investigations.

The CROOK Act has gained support from a number of anti-corruption organisations, including Transparency International and Global Witness. It is one of a number of pieces of legislation included in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that passed the House of Representatives three months ago. Whether it becomes a reality depends on it being included in the Senate's final version of the NDAA, which is expected to be voted on by the end of the year.

If the CROOK Act receives final approval and is signed into law, it could certainly plug a hole in the US' attempts to tackle corruption. The 2018 Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in US v Hoskins confirmed that the FCPA does not cover foreign officials who receive bribes, unless they do so while within the US. Yet while the CROOK Act may prove effective, it would be likely to further fuel international criticism that US law enforcement is using the FCPA as a covert mechanism to exert a form of economic dominance over other countries - an accusation that has been repeatedly aimed at the US.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More