ARTICLE
11 October 2024

Dealer Group Sues FTC To Enjoin Administrative Proceeding Over Alleged Junk Fees And Discriminatory Lending Practices

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On October 4, 2024, Asbury Automotive Group, a Fortune 500 company and one of the largest automobile dealer groups in the United States, sued the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enjoin as unconstitutional the FTC's administrative proceeding against Asbury over alleged junk fees and discriminatory lending practices.
United States Consumer Protection

On October 4, 2024, Asbury Automotive Group, a Fortune 500 company and one of the largest automobile dealer groups in the United States, sued the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enjoin as unconstitutional the FTC's administrative proceeding against Asbury over alleged junk fees and discriminatory lending practices. The administrative complaint filed by the FTC against Asbury in August 2024 alleged that three Texas dealerships owned by Asbury "systematically" packed junk fees into the cost of the vehicles it sold to consumers and discriminated against Black and Latino consumers by targeting them with unwanted and higher-priced add-ons.

Asbury's complaint against the FTC, filed in federal court in Texas, seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief "to prevent irreparable harm to [Asbury's] business, reputation, and constitutional rights—including [Asbury's] rights to due process and trial by jury." Asbury contends the FTC's administrative proceedings is unconstitutional for several reasons. First, Asbury alleges that the FTC seeks to adjudicate private rights—e.g., whether Asbury may sell third-party products like surface protective coatings or the terms on which it may extend credit—in an administrative proceeding in violation of Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Second, Asbury argues the FTC proceeding violates its Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, because the FTC seeks to adjudicate claims akin to common law fraud and deceit, and its due process rights, because the FTC has allegedly denied Asbury sufficient notice of the factual basis for its claims. Finally, Asbury contends the statutory constraint placing FTC commissioners beyond presidential removal power renders the administrative proceeding unconstitutional.

The FTC's action against Asbury follows settlements reached with other auto dealers over the past couple of years for similar practices, but Asbury's lawsuit against the FTC suggests that U.S. car dealers may be inclined to push back. In addition to Asbury's lawsuit, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) in January 2024 filed a lawsuit challenging the FTC's adoption of its "Combating Auto Retail Scams" (CARS) Rule targeting allegedly misleading advertising and sales tactics by new car dealers. The FTC has since paused the effective date of the final CARS Rule pending resolution of that protest, with the Fifth Circuit slated to hear the challenge on October 9, 2024.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More